menu changes in mkiv?

menu changes in mkiv?

[Hans van der Meer]

What has been changed regarding menus?
Previous code stops working with the following error message:

! Missing { inserted.

<to be read again> 
                   \par 
<inserted text> ...ect \everysetmenucommands \par 
                                                  \par \par \par \definepale...
\scrn_menu_insert_indeed ...\everysetmenucommands 
                                                  \csname \??am :\c!menu :\n...
\scrn_menu_insert_checked ...nu_insert_indeed {#1}
                                                  \fi 
\scrn_menu_bottom ... \scrn_menu_insert \v!bottom 
                                                  \kern \zeropoint \egroup \...
\dogettextboxes ...\relax \the \bottomtextcontent 
                                                  \vskip \bottomheight \vfil…

Better than this I cannot trace back.
But probably just some macro definition changed???

Hans van der Meer


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: menu changes in mkiv?

[Hans Hagen]

On 24-8-2011 13:54, Hans van der Meer wrote:
> What has been changed regarding menus?
> Previous code stops working with the following error message:
>
> ! Missing { inserted.
>
> <to be read again>
>                     \par
> <inserted text>  ...ect \everysetmenucommands \par
>                                                    \par \par \par \definepale...
> \scrn_menu_insert_indeed ...\everysetmenucommands
>                                                    \csname \??am :\c!menu :\n...
> \scrn_menu_insert_checked ...nu_insert_indeed {#1}
>                                                    \fi
> \scrn_menu_bottom ... \scrn_menu_insert \v!bottom
>                                                    \kern \zeropoint \egroup \...
> \dogettextboxes ...\relax \the \bottomtextcontent
>                                                    \vskip \bottomheight \vfil…
>
> Better than this I cannot trace back.
> But probably just some macro definition changed???

No, just the inheritance chain (part of an ongoing process where 
Wolfgang and I replace some of the setup/define as well as localframed 
code with the command definer code that has been around for a while now. 
Deep down it means that instead of more hard coded inheritance we now 
have a more dynamic one (a bit slower but less code and hash usage). So, 
what you observe is probably a temporary side effect.

Small (!) example needed.

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________