From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/71756 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Behaviour of \tfx versus \tfa Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4E983B20.6010308@wxs.nl> References: <4B772D63-F011-47FD-949D-187CB5CCC4CF@xs4all.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318599488 17519 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2011 13:38:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Hans van der Meer To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Oct 14 15:38:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REhxU-0008VR-U7 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84C4CB060; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nheom+2fafnx; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748EACB059; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E4DCB059 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NcUIXDc-PKyi for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter4-til.mf.surf.net (filter4-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5741FCB056 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter4-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p9EDbjmm021329 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:45 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.100; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 5.3h2) with ESMTP (TLS) id 9200-1713362 for multiple; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:37:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4B772D63-F011-47FD-949D-187CB5CCC4CF@xs4all.nl> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=11; city=Den Haag; latitude=52.0833; longitude=4.3000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.0833,4.3000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 05FIBBJFo - 7f67887bc91c - 20111014 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.216 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:71756 Archived-At: On 14-10-2011 11:01, Hans van der Meer wrote: > I found the following disparity in behaviour between \tfa, etc. and \tfx, \tfxx: > \tfa, \tfb etc. do change mathsize too, but \tfx, \tfxx do not > > % These remedy it: > \let\orgtfx\tfx > \let\orgtfxx\tfxx > \def\tfx{\orgtfx\dosetcurrentfontsize{x}} > \def\tfxx{\orgtfxx\dosetcurrentfontsize{xx}} > > Is the difference intentional? Or is Hans willing to incorporate the change in a next beta? this is intentional as tx and txx are only meant for (nested) \high an \low implementations while \tfa are for heads and such Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________