From: Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: MetaPost: Confusion with `function()` and `xyscaled`
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:08:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA198E0.40406@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319210803.3766.37.camel@mattotaupa>
Am 21.10.2011 17:26, schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear Peter,
>
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Peter Rolf:
>
>> I agree, this is confusing on the first sight. But scaling is not meant
>> as 'scaling to' a dimension. In fact is is just a simple multiplication.
>> The reason why it seems to work this way with
>> 'fullsquare' and such predefined paths is, that they have a 'neutral'
>> size/scale (bounding box size of filled path is (1pt,1pt)).
>
> So how can I find out what the dimension of the path of a function is?
> Not scaling it, it also looked pretty small, so I am guessing (1pt,1pt).
I guess in this case its size is (10,log(10)) + pen size when drawn.
>
>> Multiplying such a path with (x,y) gives an object with size (1*x,1*y).
>> In general: if the bounding box of an object has the size (a,b) and you
>> scale it with (x,y), the resulting object has a size of (ax,by). That's
>> all the magic.
>
> but if you use numbers with a unit than it should not be multiplied but
> expanded to that value, should not it? Otherwise I am unsure how
> multiplication works with a unit.
>
1pt is the base unit in MP (used if no dimension is given; probably
stored as 65536sp (scaled point) units).
Now if you use pure numerics for scale, such as 'xscaled 2', this is
interpreted as '2pt' (or 2*65536sp). If you use any dimension, it is
also converted into scaled points. All the same for MP.
If I'm right this should all be the same (untested)
xscaled 2
xscaled 2pt
xscaled (2*65536sp)
1 = 1pt = 65536sp
>> I must admit that this wasn't clear to me before you came up with your
>> question. So thanks for that. :-)
>
> Thank you for your answer. As written above it is still not entirely
> clear to me. I hope you can remedy my last confusion.
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-20 23:14 MetaFun: " Paul Menzel
2011-10-21 11:38 ` Paul Menzel
2011-10-21 15:02 ` Peter Rolf
2011-10-21 15:26 ` MetaPost: " Paul Menzel
2011-10-21 16:08 ` Peter Rolf [this message]
2011-10-23 14:12 ` Paul Menzel
2011-10-23 15:17 ` Peter Rolf
2011-10-23 21:39 ` Hans Hagen
2011-10-21 20:53 ` MetaFun: " Aditya Mahajan
2011-10-22 7:24 ` Hans Hagen
2011-10-23 13:17 ` MetaFun manual: Incorrect label of ordinate axis on page 382, section 9.3 drawing functions (was: Confusion with `function()` and `xyscaled`) Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA198E0.40406@gmx.net \
--to=indiego@gmx.net \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).