* setupnotedefinition
@ 2012-02-13 8:52 Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-02-13 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi all,
the command
\setupnotedefinition
is no longer defined in the latest beta (strc-not.mkvi). Is this an
oversight, or has it been replaced by something else?
All best
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setupnotedefinition
2012-02-13 8:52 setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2012-02-13 9:03 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-02-13 9:56 ` setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-02-13 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 13.02.2012 um 09:52 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
> Hi all,
>
> the command
>
> \setupnotedefinition
>
> is no longer defined in the latest beta (strc-not.mkvi). Is this an oversight, or has it been replaced by something else?
The new command is \setupnotation.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setupnotedefinition
2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2012-02-13 9:56 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-02-13 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On 02/13/2012 10:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> Is this an oversight, or has it been replaced by something else?
> The new command is \setupnotation.
>
> Wolfgang
Thank you Wolfgang. Corrected in wiki.
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-13 9:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-13 8:52 setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster
2012-02-13 9:56 ` setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).