* setupnotedefinition @ 2012-02-13 8:52 Thomas A. Schmitz 2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-02-13 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Hi all, the command \setupnotedefinition is no longer defined in the latest beta (strc-not.mkvi). Is this an oversight, or has it been replaced by something else? All best Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setupnotedefinition 2012-02-13 8:52 setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-02-13 9:03 ` Wolfgang Schuster 2012-02-13 9:56 ` setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-02-13 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Am 13.02.2012 um 09:52 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: > Hi all, > > the command > > \setupnotedefinition > > is no longer defined in the latest beta (strc-not.mkvi). Is this an oversight, or has it been replaced by something else? The new command is \setupnotation. Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: setupnotedefinition 2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-02-13 9:56 ` Thomas A. Schmitz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-02-13 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users On 02/13/2012 10:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Is this an oversight, or has it been replaced by something else? > The new command is \setupnotation. > > Wolfgang Thank you Wolfgang. Corrected in wiki. Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-13 9:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-13 8:52 setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz 2012-02-13 9:03 ` setupnotedefinition Wolfgang Schuster 2012-02-13 9:56 ` setupnotedefinition Thomas A. Schmitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).