From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/74637 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Thomas A. Schmitz" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: footnotes rewritten Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4F44C6F0.30607@uni-bonn.de> References: <08CAF983-5CAB-4525-A0A4-4C727C904E82@st.estfiles.de> <2852DA0E-E487-4347-B6A3-2D2847DC70FA@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329907479 30681 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2012 10:44:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:44:39 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Feb 22 11:44:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S09ga-0002YX-RN for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48068CAB03; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fEo80mv1mrit; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD5ACB211; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C59CB211 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FkMgxRS8vpGj for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter1-nij.mf.surf.net (filter1-nij.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.152]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5DACAB03 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from uni-bonn.de (mail.uni-bonn.de [131.220.15.113]) by filter1-nij.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q1MAi1O2032721 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:01 +0100 Original-Received: from [87.178.38.20] (account tschmit1@uni-bonn.de HELO localhost.localdomain) by fe2.uni-bonn.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTPSA id 10603956 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:44:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120217 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: <2852DA0E-E487-4347-B6A3-2D2847DC70FA@st.estfiles.de> X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0074 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=131.220.15.113; country=DE; region=07; city=Bonn; latitude=50.7333; longitude=7.1000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=50.7333,7.1000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 07GAWI1Ao - d83d9497ef7a - 20120222 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.152 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:74637 Archived-At: On 02/21/2012 09:24 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Am I the only one who uses footnotes ? > > ;o) > > Steffen > No, I'm using footnotes too, and the current implementation is an absolute disaster. I get weird and unexpected behavior as well. 1. Footnotes are shifted to the following page. This puts a huge black triangle at the position of the footnote marker. I have no idea how to get rid of it, and I have no idea why this is the default behavior - nobody wants that in printed documents, I suppose? 2. Footnote numbers in the footnotes themselves are shifted one line down. Luckily, I still have 2011.11.29 around, which doesn't have these problems. Hans had warned about the current beta a few days ago; I hope things will calm down in the not-too-distant future... Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________