Re: is there a reason not to fix this bug?

["Pablo Rodríguez" <oinos@web.de>]

On 12/03/12 08:58, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 10-3-2012 21:57, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
>> Dear community,
>>
>> Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today):
>>
>> strc-lst.mkvi:
> 
> 1 - comment (for a while)
> 2 - remove (as no longer relevant)
> 3 - repair (because broken)
> 
> it needs time to choose one and there is only so much of it available

Sorry for the late reply, Hans (I don't have daily access to my personal
computer [and when I sit in front of it, I have a bunch of things to do).

Many thanks for fixing the bug.

I'm afraid I don't understand your reply (sorry, but it's all Greek to
me, I don't get the context [no pun intended in both cases])

I apologize if my original message wasn't kind or respectful enough. I
didn't understand what happened and I was searching for an answer (of
course, not demanding it).

I really appreciate your awesome work and the work of the community
members (especially Wolfgang). Many thanks for it to everyone.

I would like contribute to ConTeXt, but right now I'm afraid I can
mainly report bugs (and ask questions on what I don't understand and I'm
not able to find elsewhere).

Sorry for the bad tone of my previous request (if my question sounded
demanding). I'm really thankful for ConTeXt and the community around of
it (although I don't know to express my gratitude sometimes).


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________