From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/75680 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Rolf Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Rendering differences between PDF viewers Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8D3D9B.1040406@gmx.net> References: <1334469628.3748.29.camel@kip-laptop> <4F8AF085.6070208@wxs.nl> <1334619889.28437.1.camel@kip-laptop> <4F8D138B.3030605@wxs.nl> <1334645858.2011.5.camel@kip-laptop> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334656431 23423 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2012 09:53:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:53:51 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Apr 17 11:53:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SK56X-0004yp-Q0 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F135A1021F; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uOSMECrIgkFq; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6170101E9; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D51D101E9 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dRnYMtKzUI9r for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (filter1-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.69]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85530101E3 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with SMTP id q3H9rXdN012444 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:53:33 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 09:53:32 -0000 Original-Received: from ip-92-50-87-192.unitymediagroup.de (EHLO [192.168.178.3]) [92.50.87.192] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 17 Apr 2012 11:53:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #24293357 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19LSAIpK0dLtNqeSYcQpbH+NCb8+fADels+QE2DtQ C2vft4nPmdznej User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 In-Reply-To: <1334645858.2011.5.camel@kip-laptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.165.64.22; country=DE; latitude=51.0000; longitude=9.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.0000,9.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0NGWVRxBp - 861026f69cfe - 20120417 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.69 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:75680 Archived-At: Am 17.04.2012 08:57, schrieb Kip Warner: > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 08:54 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: >> (AR might have flaws but so do all other viewers I've seen.) > > I don't doubt it, but something that salient is pretty bad though. The > whole document looks just awful. > >> Is there a small example file? > > Sure. > > I might be wrong, but is this color shift not just a 'page group' problem, caused by the transparent PNG? Peter ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________