Re: Did usage of \expanded changed?

["Thomas A. Schmitz" <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de>]

On 05/11/2012 01:28 PM, Peter Schorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I "reactivated" some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems
> that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it
> with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My
> problem seems to be this line of the full example below:
>
> 	\doifsomething\Paragraphmark{\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\fullheadnumber/\rawnumber[ParagraphNumber]}}}%
>
> The error shows itself in the line:
>
> 	Should be 1/1: \in[test]
>
> As \in[test] gives me 1/3 instead of 1/1. (1 was the number assigned to
> the first paragraph - 3 is the acutal number).
>
> Can someone tell me what I need to change?
>
> Thanks in advanced
> P.

See this thread: 
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20120402.144627.e46a9f9f.en.html

and try to construct a "minimal example" next time.

Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________