ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Haltiwanger <john.haltiwanger@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Seeking a Deeper ConTeXt: Questions for Initializing
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:53:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c1f1f860905250953g26e09b99k8e150141176fc39@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1AC9B8.3050807@wxs.nl>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2116 bytes --]

>
>  I am not averse to rolling my own, I am just confused why, if environments
>> are so powerful and flexible (flexible meaning one can easily change
>> things,
>> unlike document classes), there are no pre-rolled environments available.
>> I
>> am thinking here of standardized thesis environments for universities, or
>> a
>> nice letter environment to demonstrate the beauty of TeX.
>>
>
> sure, but all organizations want it slightly different


Okay, but that does imply that an organization can set up an environment and
expect its members to use it.


>
> Yes, I meant RDF. XML is a very important format. I find it odd that TeX
>> can
>> generate PDF but cannot output simple XML. So in order to have a
>> semantical
>> document I must write it in XML and then process it with ConTeXt? Is the
>> capacity there (through LuaTeX perhaps) to write an XML generator?
>>
>
> sure, but how useful is it to have a representation of (e.g.) a node list
> that makes up a paragraph in xml format? no app can do something with it


I'm not sure what you mean by a representation of a node list for a
paragraph (I am new to TeX, remember), but I am thinking more along the
lines of extracting Title, Author, and the content. Typesetting is not the
goal, as XML is for computers not people.


> maybe at some point the adobe and microsoft xml output formats become an
> option (which then involves resources like fonts and graphics as well so
>  it's pretty bulky and one might wonder what gain there is)
>

The gain of XML is participation in the semantic web and concordance with
many new data keeping rules in governments and organizations.

 While I would expect the reasons for wanting XML output would be obvious, a
> concrete example is that at least one journal is deprecating LaTeX because
> it wants to archive all of its articles in XML.
>

in which case it keeps the input in xml and converts to other formats (coule
> be tex in the case of rendering print)


 The input is actually a specific version of Word. This is converted to XML.
In the case of LaTeX, the LaTeX is converted to Word and then to XML.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3358 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-25 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-24 17:17 John Haltiwanger
2009-05-24 18:35 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2009-05-25 16:30   ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-25 16:39     ` Hans Hagen
2009-05-25 16:53       ` John Haltiwanger [this message]
2009-05-25 16:59         ` Hans Hagen
2009-05-26 15:54       ` Bruce D'Arcus
2009-05-26 21:26         ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-26 22:08           ` luigi scarso
2009-05-26 23:07           ` Bruce D'Arcus
2009-05-25 16:50     ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-05-25 17:00       ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-25 17:12         ` Mohamed Bana
2009-05-25 17:24         ` Hans Hagen
2009-05-25 17:51           ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-25 18:00             ` Arthur Reutenauer
2009-05-25 18:09               ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-25 18:21                 ` Arthur Reutenauer
2009-05-25 18:24                   ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-25 18:55                 ` Hans Hagen
2009-05-25 21:09                   ` luigi scarso
2009-05-25 21:14                     ` Hans Hagen
2009-05-25 21:16                     ` Arthur Reutenauer
2009-05-25 20:25             ` Mohamed Bana
2009-05-25 21:02               ` John Haltiwanger
2009-05-26 22:27               ` Wolfgang Schuster
2009-05-25 17:23     ` Arthur Reutenauer
2009-05-25 18:26     ` Aditya Mahajan
2009-05-25 18:35       ` John Haltiwanger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c1f1f860905250953g26e09b99k8e150141176fc39@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=john.haltiwanger@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).