From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4927 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eckhart =?iso-8859-1?Q?Guth=F6hrlein?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: choice for table material Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 18:23:52 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010704175918.00a9e350@public.uni-hamburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395558 29888 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:52:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ConTeXt mailing list Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4927 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4927 I am a bit confused about the different possibilities to typeset tables, so let me first outline how I have understood things. If a table may be split across pages, tabulate is the one to choose. If not, there are two possibilities: table and TABLE. TABLE is the most recent development. Is it principally more advanced and preferrable to table, which would mean that table is there for backward compatibility reasons only, or are there effects which can be achieved with table, but not with TABLE? Eckhart