From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5528 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eckhart =?iso-8859-1?Q?Guth=F6hrlein?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: \AA (m-units and \Angstrom) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:24:26 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010906140630.00a81580@public.uni-hamburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396116 2437 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:01:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ConTeXt mailing list Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5528 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5528 The use of \AA is problematic, in my case concerning the use of \Angstrom with m-units. Here come the problems I noticed, and my workaround for those who are interested. Since \Angstrom is defined to give \AA, it can't be used in math mode ('Please use \mathaccent in math mode'). Furthermore, there is a problem with \setupbodyfont[aer]: \AA produces nothing in the output. This is a more general problem, not restricted to m-units. Probably, \AA should be redefined. \def\AA{\Aring} is a possibility, \def\AA{\hbox{\Aring}} works in math mode too. But superscripts get placed too high, touching the characters of the above line in inline formulas. I'm currently using \def\AA{\text{\AA}} with the definition of \text copied from the latest publically available m-math.tex, enclosed by \unprotect..\protect to make private command sequence names accessible. In principle, I would agree that not using the unit Angstrom would be the best solution, but since it is not up to me... And a working \AA is of course needed for some languages. Eckhart