From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6245 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: xml comments Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:03:19 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20011126155901.03f58e28@server-1> References: <200111261420.fAQEK8v07913@sol.cs.uni-dortmund.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396783 8834 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:13:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Patrick Gundlach In-Reply-To: <200111261420.fAQEK8v07913@sol.cs.uni-dortmund.de> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6245 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6245 At 03:20 PM 11/26/2001 +0100, Patrick Gundlach wrote: >\starttext >\startbuffer > >one > >two >\stopbuffer >\processXMLbuffer >\stoptext > >this should (as far as I understand the spec right) only output >one two and not the second comment () what exactly do you mean with 'output'? Should I treat ' ah, i instantly get an head ache when i see this line of spec >I hope you don't understand me wrong: with all my bug reports >I don't want to complain >about context, which is in my eyes a great piece of software. a bug reports <> comment -) there should not be bugs; also i know rather well which pieces of context are coded ok (apart from bugs) and which parts are crap (which i have to work on), so keep on mailing Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------