From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6874 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Incomplete style switch Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:17:05 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20020210201541.03525ae8@server-1> References: <16715699.20020207215103@bigfoot.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397378 14521 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:22:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta In-Reply-To: <16715699.20020207215103@bigfoot.com> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6874 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6874 At 09:51 PM 2/7/2002 +0100, you wrote: >My question is: is this a bug? Shouldn't the style specified in >the label definition take precedence? (i.e. shouldn't it be >applied *after* the location style?) it's a left over from an old mechanism which needs to be repaired, which i will do (new beta soon anyway) Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- fall-back web server: www.pragma-pod.nl -------------------------------------------------------------------------