From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8028 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: new flag for fields Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 20:57:05 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20020526203355.02ce0e78@remote-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398462 24245 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:41:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8028 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8028 Hi, While working on an (educational) project file, i ran into the problem (again) that by default text fields are spell checked by acrobat. This is a typical example of an pdf viewer extension where the adobe developers had no clue about pdf usage (imagine that one uses pdf docs in testing languages and suddenly the student input gets spell checked automatically). So, here we're stick with another negativeswitch: \setupfield[...][option=nocheck] % dutch: geencontrole a positive formulated switch would have been better Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------