From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9651 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[4]: Gamma support in TeXExec? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:00:13 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20021025105907.00ac7178@server-1> References: <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl> <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1> <10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it> <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035537639 8726 80.91.224.249 (25 Oct 2002 09:20:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Olaf Weber , ntg-context@ntg.nl Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1850dx-0002GU-00 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:20:37 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB91F10ADF; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:21:42 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mail.solcon.nl (mail.solcon.nl [212.45.33.11]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5619310ADF for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:20:35 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-ade.nl (wc-58016.solcon.nl [212.45.58.16]) by mail.solcon.nl (8.12.5/pre1.0-MySQL/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9P9Dphf021562; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:13:51 +0200 Original-Received: from LAPTOP-3.wxs.nl (laptop-3 [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-ade.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9P9JUgg008460; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:19:30 +0200 X-Sender: hagen-mail@server-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta In-Reply-To: <190601835.20021025085442@iol.it> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020919) (mail.solcon.nl) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9651 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9651 At 08:54 AM 10/25/2002 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >Thursday, October 24, 2002 Olaf Weber wrote: > > >> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt, > >> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ? > >OW> Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could >OW> end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is >OW> known to collide with another suffix. > >Are there Omega implementations for DOS? > >I mean, I think we should stop worrying about this. If an DOS >implementation is indeed done, they can change it with no big >problems. Isn't that the djgpp variant? what does it do with suffixes? Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------