From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9824 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[4]: About itemize Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:40:35 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20021113093924.00af2d78@server-1> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021112191244.03360dc8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112191244.03360dc8@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037177434 23553 80.91.224.249 (13 Nov 2002 08:50:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BtEH-00067b-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:50:33 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E8910AF4; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:52:14 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.solcon.nl (mail.solcon.nl [212.45.33.11]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5662E10AE9 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:50:44 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-ade.nl (wc-58016.solcon.nl [212.45.58.16]) by mail.solcon.nl (8.12.5/pre1.0-MySQL/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAD9lPSI006453 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:47:25 +0100 Original-Received: from LAPTOP-3.wxs.nl (laptop-3 [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-ade.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gAD8ofgi019437 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:50:41 +0100 X-Sender: hagen-mail@server-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Original-To: ntg-context@ref.vet.uu.nl In-Reply-To: <1862726500.20021112231225@iol.it> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020919) (mail.solcon.nl) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9824 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9824 At 11:12 PM 11/12/2002 +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >Tuesday, November 12, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: > > >>Would it really be that tricky? It should just decide wether to > >>skip the next \par or not ... > >HH> well, the point is that no command, except fr sectioning and index >commands >HH> look ahead, so what excactly do you mean with 'skip the next par'? > >Uhm. Ok, let's get at it slowly. I don't know how it works >internally, but regadless of this, the behaviour seems to be the >same regardless of wether I leave an empty line after the \stop, >or not (and also before the \start, or not). Do \starts and \stops >automatically force a new paragraph all the time? only when before=\blank or so, but some commands do an \par themselves because they assume to be display material, Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------