From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10013 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: DocBookInContext & multi-languages (newbie) / utf Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:31:58 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20021204173013.02ecb930@server-1> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021204002649.00ae4678@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021202225635.03194130@remote-1> <20021202174029.GA24554@mail.inet.hr> <5.1.0.14.1.20021202132549.00af0328@server-1> <20021129072039.GA7792@mail.inet.hr> <20021129072039.GA7792@mail.inet.hr> <5.1.0.14.1.20021202132549.00af0328@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021202153537.03d21258@server-1> <20021202174029.GA24554@mail.inet.hr> <5.1.0.14.1.20021202225635.03194130@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021204002649.00ae4678@remote-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039019492 21352 80.91.224.249 (4 Dec 2002 16:31:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JcQq-0005Xr-00 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:31:28 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2413B10AE8; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:33:50 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.solcon.nl (mail.solcon.nl [212.45.33.11]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBB410AE7 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:32:18 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-ade.nl (wc-58016.solcon.nl [212.45.58.16]) by mail.solcon.nl (8.12.5/pre1.0-MySQL/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gB4HPDsS029738 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:25:14 +0100 Original-Received: from LAPTOP-3.wxs.nl (laptop-3 [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-ade.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB4GWEgk016730 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:32:15 +0100 X-Sender: hagen-mail@server-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <20021204141001.GA20691@mail.inet.hr> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020919) (mail.solcon.nl) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10013 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10013 At 03:10 PM 12/4/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Hans Hagen (pragma@wxs.nl) wrote: > > > names are best; for languages like chinese things are slightly more > > complicates because there the handler (several encodings are supported > > there) must take care of inter character breaking as well > >I've just looked briefly on two Devanagari Unicode fonts, and e.g. Devanagari >letter A with the code U+0905, is named "glyph92". Other characters just >follow >the pattern. hm, in the thousands-of-glyphs test doc that i use i see that they do have proper names); what is a good type1 font for testing? we need - some demo utf input - a font with the glyphs - a suitable map/encoding file for pdftex Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------