* Emulating AMS stuff in ConTeXt
@ 2002-12-07 18:24 Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-08 20:26 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2002-12-07 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
while trying to build an AMS emulation layer on top of ConTeXt
math macros, I defined (among the other) the following macros:
\def\startalign{%
\startformula
\let\\\cr
\grabuntil{stopalign}\doeqalign
}
\def\doeqalign#1{\eqalign{#1\cr}\stopformula}
\let\stopalign\relax
These allow me to write:
\startalign
a & = b = \\
& = c
\stopalign
and everything is fine. Yet I cannot do
\placeformula[hook]
\startalign
a & = b = \\
& = c
\stopalign
because of expansion problems. Why? How can I define the stuff?
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Emulating AMS stuff in ConTeXt
2002-12-07 18:24 Emulating AMS stuff in ConTeXt Giuseppe Bilotta
@ 2002-12-08 20:26 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-08 21:36 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2002-12-08 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
At 07:24 PM 12/7/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>def\startalign{%
> \startformula
> \let\\\cr
> \grabuntil{stopalign}\doeqalign
>}
>\def\doeqalign#1{\eqalign{#1\cr}\stopformula}
^^ better make that \crcr in order to catch
users \\
>\let\stopalign\relax
>
>These allow me to write:
>
>\startalign
> a & = b = \\
> & = c
>\stopalign
isn't \startmathalign a better choice?
>and everything is fine. Yet I cannot do
>
>\placeformula[hook]
>\startalign
> a & = b = \\
> & = c
>\stopalign
>
>because of expansion problems. Why? How can I define the stuff?
took me a couple of cd's to uncover this -)
(1) placeformula has to look ahead, and the next command is not seen as
something math; so,
(2) i made another lookahead, and then
(3) we ran into those \cr & and # things that may not always show up
everywhere, so
(4) i had to rewrite a low level macro that i didn't like rewriting, i.e.
(5) i had to use a variant i'd always thought that could be avoided
so, you spoiled my afternoon -)
btw, if you isolate/collect the ams math that's not yet in m-newmat, i can
see if/how i can add it there in a configurable way, so if some things
fails, we can look into it later
you can try the version i just uploaded
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re[2]: Emulating AMS stuff in ConTeXt
2002-12-08 20:26 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2002-12-08 21:36 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2002-12-08 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Sunday, December 8, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
HH> At 07:24 PM 12/7/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>>def\startalign{%
>> \startformula
>> \let\\\cr
>> \grabuntil{stopalign}\doeqalign
>>}
>>\def\doeqalign#1{\eqalign{#1\cr}\stopformula}
HH> ^^ better make that \crcr in order to catch
HH> users \\
Will fix. I just "copied" the AMS defs ...
>>\let\stopalign\relax
>>
>>These allow me to write:
>>
>>\startalign
>> a & = b = \\
>> & = c
>>\stopalign
HH> isn't \startmathalign a better choice?
Maybe. I just "converted" the AMS-LaTeX "align" environment, so I
kept the align name.
>>and everything is fine. Yet I cannot do
>>
>>\placeformula[hook]
>>\startalign
>> a & = b = \\
>> & = c
>>\stopalign
>>
>>because of expansion problems. Why? How can I define the stuff?
HH> took me a couple of cd's to uncover this -)
HH> (1) placeformula has to look ahead, and the next command is not seen as
HH> something math; so,
HH> (2) i made another lookahead, and then
HH> (3) we ran into those \cr & and # things that may not always show up
HH> everywhere, so
HH> (4) i had to rewrite a low level macro that i didn't like rewriting, i.e.
HH> (5) i had to use a variant i'd always thought that could be avoided
HH> so, you spoiled my afternoon -)
:P Sorry, but it's your choice to work on sundays ;)
HH> btw, if you isolate/collect the ams math that's not yet in m-newmat, i can
HH> see if/how i can add it there in a configurable way, so if some things
HH> fails, we can look into it later
Ok. I'm "filling it up" as it comes while typesetting/converting
some notes (part of them were hand-written, part of the in LaTeX
form).
HH> you can try the version i just uploaded
Will do.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-08 21:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-07 18:24 Emulating AMS stuff in ConTeXt Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-08 20:26 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-08 21:36 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).