Cross referencing not working?

Cross referencing not working?

[Otared Kavian]

In December Giuseppe Bilotta reported that cross referencing had 
disappeared.
Then it came back (at least until two weeks ago...) and again it has 
somehow disappeared, or it has a weird behavoir (from version:
ConTeXt  ver: 2003.1.31  fmt: 2003.2.4  int: english  mes: english)

Below is an example: if I put the "formula 1" before "formula 2" 
nothing gets numbered.
However the other way around "formula 1" gets numbered but not "formula 
2", nor "formula 3".

Any comment is welcomed.
Cheers: OK
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\starttext
Let us try the cross-reference macros in \ConTeXt: the following should 
be numbered
% this is formula 2
\placeformula[equation2]
$$ 1 + e^{i \pi} = 0. $$
and
% this is formula 1
\startformula[equation1]
1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.
\stopformula
Equation (\in[equation1]) or (\in[equation2]) establishes an intersting 
relation between the most important numbers: $1$, $e$, $i := 
\sqrt{-1}$, $\pi $ and $0$.

However for some unknown reason the \ConTeXt\ commands

\type{\placeformula[equation2]}, \type{\startformula[equation1]} and 
\type{\in[reference]}

do not work anymore\dots{}

And this also should be numbered:
% this is formula 3
\startformula[equation3]
1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.
\stopformula

\bigskip
Where is the problem?
\stoptext

Re: Cross referencing not working?

[Hans Hagen]

At 01:54 PM 2/4/2003 +0100, Otared Kavian wrote:
>In December Giuseppe Bilotta reported that cross referencing had disappeared.
>Then it came back (at least until two weeks ago...) and again it has 
>somehow disappeared, or it has a weird behavoir (from version:
>ConTeXt  ver: 2003.1.31  fmt: 2003.2.4  int: english  mes: english)
>
>Below is an example: if I put the "formula 1" before "formula 2" nothing 
>gets numbered.
>However the other way around "formula 1" gets numbered but not "formula 
>2", nor "formula 3".
>
>Any comment is welcomed.
>Cheers: OK
>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>\starttext
>Let us try the cross-reference macros in \ConTeXt: the following should be 
>numbered
>% this is formula 2
>\placeformula[equation2]
>$$ 1 + e^{i \pi} = 0. $$
>and
>% this is formula 1
>\startformula[equation1]
>1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.
>\stopformula
>Equation (\in[equation1]) or (\in[equation2]) establishes an intersting 
>relation between the most important numbers: $1$, $e$, $i := \sqrt{-1}$, 
>$\pi $ and $0$.
>
>However for some unknown reason the \ConTeXt\ commands
>
>\type{\placeformula[equation2]}, \type{\startformula[equation1]} and 
>\type{\in[reference]}
>
>do not work anymore\dots{}
>
>And this also should be numbered:
>% this is formula 3
>\startformula[equation3]
>1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.
>\stopformula
>
>\bigskip
>Where is the problem?
>\stoptext

(1) only placed formulas get numbered
(2) avoid $$ $$ and use \startformula instead
(3) in \startformula[somehing] the something is not a ref but a class of 
formulas

so:

\starttext

Let us try the cross-reference macros in \ConTeXt: the
following should be numbered

\placeformula[equation1]
\startformula 1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.\stopformula

and

\placeformula[equation2]
\startformula 1 + e^{i \pi} = 0.\stopformula

Equation (\in[equation1]) or (\in[equation2]) establishes an
intersting relation between the most important numbers: $1$,
$e$, $i := \sqrt{-1}$, $\pi $ and $0$.

However for some unknown reason the \ConTeXt\ commands

\stoptext
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
                       Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
                     documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------