From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10895 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: m-graph and the definition of \@@expanded Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 20:13:08 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20030209200911.032c3e60@remote-1> References: <20030209171923.7635@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044822563 1179 80.91.224.249 (9 Feb 2003 20:29:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 20:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Ntg Context" Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hy4n-0000Ic-00 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 21:29:21 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB2B10B3F; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:31:28 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52F810B2B; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:27:57 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from LAPTOP-3.wxs.nl ([213.75.94.207]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HA266A02.04A; Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:27:46 +0100 X-Sender: hagen-mail@remote-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <20030209171923.7635@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10895 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10895 At 05:19 PM 2/9/2003 +0000, Adam Lindsay wrote: >Hi ConTeXters... > >I was wondering if the metapost/fun module "m-graph" was still working >for everyone. I worked with it a lot last October/November, but haven't >had the need to revisit it recently. > >For those interested, does: > texexec --pdf --mode=demo m-graph.tex >....work correctly? >(m-graph is from tex/context/base/m-graph.tex, and the data files it >expects are in doc/metapost/base/*.d) better run this on a path where the d files are (copied), otherwise you depend on the file searching in kpse, which may not find the d files because the file type is unnknown >Am I the only one having problems, or were the syst-* macros changed >after 31 October 2002 so as to conflict with something deep inside >graph.mp? I get the same problem with both the latest ConTeXt as well as >one from ~5 December. > >It *might* something else I'm trying to debug, but I get the following >when trying to \usemodule[graph]: this is a tricky thing go into m-graph.tex and change the # into \# into the inclusions section (in tex #'s are always kind of problematic, esp in expansions and macros) normally this should work ok. This piece of code will be removed in due time, john hobby made this patch and it will be available in future plain mp files. Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------