From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11892 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[3]: Backgrounds Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:02:35 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.1.20030411180118.016c46e8@server-1> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325094633.031a8c80@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20030325131938.01d9af40@server-1> <9619582618.20030325153623@iol.it> <871y0biuyd.fsf@gundla.ch> <5.2.0.9.1.20030410215807.014f3880@localhost> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050077164 2950 80.91.224.249 (11 Apr 2003 16:06:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Fri Apr 11 18:06:02 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19411Z-0000hO-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:05:09 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D2710AF9; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:05:41 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mail.solcon.nl (mail.solcon.nl [212.45.33.11]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D11410AEC for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:02:53 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-net.nl (wc-58016.solcon.nl [212.45.58.16]) by mail.solcon.nl (8.12.9/SQL-8.12.9-10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3BG2iIE010582 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:02:44 +0200 Original-Received: from laptop-3.wxs.nl (laptop-3 [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-net.nl (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h3BG2jEY015365 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:02:46 +0200 X-Sender: hagen-mail@server-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <17920267132.20030411153538@iol.it> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020919) (mail.solcon.nl) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11892 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11892 At 15:35 11/04/2003 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >I think I see; instead of drawing only the needed parts you draw >the whole frame and then cut the unwanted parts off. Is this more >efficient than drawing only the needed parts? simplier, less error prone, less code, more educative ... >And what about the way to determine when there is a split or not? >Could you please put a boolean that reveals it, in the next beta? >(even if I'm still convinced that using a multilocs of 0 would be >enough ... ok, it would break backwards compatibility, but how >many people are using this mechanism already?) hm, but as a heavy context user i count myself as 2048 users so ... Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------