Re: Superimposing two flowcharts

[Sytse Knypstra <S.Knypstra@eco.rug.nl>]

Thank you Hans.
The remaining problem is that the bigger shape is scaled down to the size 
of the smaller shapes.

Sytse

Here is the source:

\setupFLOWcharts[
[ nx=1, ny=1,
  dx=40pt, dy=25pt,
  breedte=260pt, hoogte=130pt
]

\setupFLOWlines
[hoek=rond,
  kaderkleur=blauw,
  pijl=ja]

\startFLOWchart[Observations]  % The bigger shape

\startFLOWcell
  \name{Obs}
  \location{1,1}
  \shape{action}
  \text{{\bf observations}}
\stopFLOWcell
\stopFLOWchart


\setupFLOWcharts
[ nx=3, ny=2,
  dx=40pt, dy=25pt,
  breedte=110pt, hoogte=130pt
]

\startFLOWchart[Parameters] % The smaller shapes

  \startFLOWcell
   \name{Obs1}
   \location{1,1}
   \shape{node}
   \connection[bt]{CanPar}
  \stopFLOWcell

  \startFLOWcell
   \name{Obs2}
   \location{2,1}
   \shape{node}
   \connection[bt]{Means}
  \stopFLOWcell

  \startFLOWcell
   \name {CanPar}
   \location{1,2}
   \shape{action}
   \text{{\bf 
canonical\\parameters}\\$\btheta=\pmatrix{\theta_1\cr\vdots\cr\theta_n\cr}$}
   \connection[-r-l]{Means}
   \comment[t]{$\mu_i=h^{-1}(\theta_i)$}
   \comment[b]{$=b'(\theta_i)$}
   \stopFLOWcell

\startFLOWcell
   \name {Means}
   \location{2,2}
   \shape{action}
   \text{{\bf means}\\~\\$\E\Y=\bmu=\pmatrix{\mu_1\cr\vdots\cr\mu_n\cr}$}
   \connection[+l+r]{CanPar}
   \comment[b]{$\theta_i=h(\mu_i)$}
   \connection[+r+l]{LinStruct}
   \comment[t]{link function}
   \comment[b]{$\eta_i=g(\mu_i)$}
  \stopFLOWcell

\startFLOWcell
   \name {LinStruct}
   \location{3,2}
   \shape{action}
   \text{{\bf linear 
structure}\\~\\$\pmatrix{\eta_i\cr\vdots\cr\eta_n\cr}={\boldmath{\eta}}=\X\bbeta$}
   \connection[-l-r]{Means}
   \comment[t]{$\mu_i=g^{-1}(\eta_i)$}
   \comment[b]{response f.}
\stopFLOWcell

\stopFLOWchart

\startoverlay
    {\FLOWchart[Parameters]}
    {\FLOWchart[Observations]}
\stopoverlay



At 4/22/2004 11:02, you wrote:
>\startoverlay
>    {... de chart ...}
>    {... de chart ...}
>\stopoverlay