From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/77877 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Clarification on methods of toggling maximum compression Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: <502593C3.3000305@wxs.nl> References: <1344637191.32545.85.camel@kip-laptop> <502591D2.1020706@wxs.nl> <1344639651.32545.88.camel@kip-laptop> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344639978 7410 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2012 23:06:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users To: Kip Warner Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Aug 11 01:06:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzyHa-0004pC-2h for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082C71023C; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0xYOj9rbhXUA; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56D3101FB; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3AF101FB for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EXLDFrvYVMOq for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-ams.mf.surf.net (filter3-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.71]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E93101EF for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter3-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q7AN69Kj022009 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:09 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.101; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.101] (unverified [10.100.1.101]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 6.1c) with ESMTP (TLS) id 2437-1713362 for multiple; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:06:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: <1344639651.32545.88.camel@kip-laptop> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=03; city=Hattem; latitude=52.4724; longitude=6.0696; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.4724,6.0696&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 03HJb699G - 658fd1b3ce9c - 20120811 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.71 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:77877 Archived-At: On 11-8-2012 01:00, Kip Warner wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 00:57 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> Are these all redundant? Do they do different things? Do I need but one >>> to achieve the desired maximum compression of the resulting PDF? >> >> keep in mind that max compression slows down processing and often not >> much is gained > > Hey Hans. My document shrinks from about 70 MB to 20MB with compression. hm, suspicious > But back to my original question, do I need all three or are they all > redundant and only one of them I actually need? If only one is > necessary, should I just use \setupbackend[level=9] ? yes, that's best because as soon as that command is called, the set value of 'level' is used, no matter what other values has been set never use \pdf* commands directly .. way too low level and use the oher command only for fast tests (i use it in small test files) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________