From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/77985 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Ctx ... Lua Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:03:54 +0200 Message-ID: <5034D8BA.4000001@wxs.nl> References: <1DB4EA15-3D6E-44D5-A696-BB096BEDC8A0@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345640668 24097 80.91.229.3 (22 Aug 2012 13:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Wolfgang Schuster To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Aug 22 15:04:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Abf-0006tu-Mc for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0371022A; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ut6ehpGuyfKf; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5552A101F2; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AD4101F2 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jG02rGUCD9Zz for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter5-til.mf.surf.net (filter5-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.221]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DA8101EC for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter5-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q7MD3lrw031243 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:03:47 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.100; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.100] (unverified [10.100.1.100]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 6.1c) with ESMTP (TLS) id 3712-1713362 for multiple; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: <1DB4EA15-3D6E-44D5-A696-BB096BEDC8A0@gmail.com> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=16; city=Zeewolde; latitude=52.3302; longitude=5.5364; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.3302,5.5364&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0WHNN3Lls - 63d4a313b73c - 20120822 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.221 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:77985 Archived-At: On 22-8-2012 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 22.08.2012 um 13:15 schrieb Proch=E1zka Luk=E1=9A : > >> Hello, >> >> sometimes in this mail discussion I'm encountering a Ctx/Lua command whi= ch has been unknown for me or I would use other (known) commands to do the = job. >> >> So - would it be possible to explain >> >> - what's the difference/advantage btw \directlua and \ctxlua > > No difference, just another name, there are even more synonyms. The \ctxlua variant is somewhat more future proof. In the past = \directlua had a mandate extra argument. Also, the \ctxlua macro can use a dedicated message namespace if needed and future versions = might have more tracing. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________