From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/79246 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22H=2E_=D6zoguz=22?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ntg-context Digest, Vol 101, Issue 42 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:31 +0100 Message-ID: <50A5F623.5040102@mmnetz.de> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353053749 10162 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2012 08:15:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Nov 16 09:15:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZH5h-0001gK-IU for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B77210358; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:47 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id atuaQkwQQJdC; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D49E10339; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D53D10339 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BKdE0pc5Znmq for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-utr.mf.surf.net (filter2-utr.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.153]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CCA102E3 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by filter2-utr.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id qAG8Fa3N000331 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:36 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.0.196] (dyndsl-095-033-116-058.ewe-ip-backbone.de [95.33.116.58]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MDW85-1TVeaA3HCf-00GzMB; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:uqy+GnaP1Jvc/MJ7kMhRUr9Av8YARn/tTlnlq7fYhk4 f8ba2qtZSBoOUJFiU6RwdJsYyVkm9jSMYwQ6lQFnmGoWsni6Zl cWPed8rGcXe44ccOZOP12yzeJJix1KJ9+VI1t/tl1PCvtP6AP6 zu+QYPAX3VZHzuQbyDo/nd+8T7xJumltTRnRzf4bbIXlX70KIn E3ch2yWC8mwZm6spFNpbGCgkd+8pVfJXzXMFHbWvZUIhMGkxiO SXXd2cd21JOqRMglCUuEl/zWFXFfUXnAIEl60rAWBEe+rw/FuF SXOr8weAAbFzSy1jIhEwDQKwyBZOis6Xtr6/X0/1TrshnijWz0 83sLQ+o9aOsb8al1IM74= X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=212.227.17.8; country=DE; latitude=51.0000; longitude=9.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.0000,9.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 04Io8fAnm - 32497010bbc9 - 20121116 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.153 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:79246 Archived-At: Am 15.11.2012 20:32, schrieb ntg-context-request@ntg.nl: > 2012-11-15 H. ?zoguz: > >> >\setuptolerance[stretch] > Are you sure, you want to use stretch? It will probably product > ugly results. > >> >\tolerance 70 > Why 70? I don't understand the use of stretch with such a strict > tolerance. What about using > > \setuptolerance [tolerant] %% or verytolerant > > instead of using stretch? > >> >Is it suitable to use tolerance and stretch in this way together? > It will probably work (though I never used it myself), but using the > ConTeXt interface \setuptolerance is the better approach. > >> >Of course I want a nice type area - but for me that means that I definitely >> >don't want a word written in the margin! > Use a higher tolerance, not a lower one. > >> >(That happens with the default \tolerance 250 (without using stretch). > What version are you using? A current ConTeXt has the \tolerance set to 200. > > \starttext\the\tolerance\stoptext Correct, my version has tolerance=200 as default, too. But in the manuel I read 250, so it was my mistake. My question is: I want to be absolutely sure, that no word is written in the margin with my settings. And if I use only \setuptolerance [tolerant] it might still happen. The reason for the smal tolerance was, that I want very small tolerance (= nice result ?) in most cases, but if a word is written in the margin, then it should stretch (word in the margin = worst case for me) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________