From: Herbert Voss <Herbert.Voss@FU-Berlin.DE>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AA0927.8060203@FU-Berlin.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AA0021.90901@mmnetz.de>
Am 19.11.2012 10:47, schrieb "H. Özoguz":
>
>> >
>> >\startproduct mydocument
>> >
>> >\component one
>> >\component two
>> >\component three
>> >\component four
>> >
>> >\stopproduct
>> >
>> >Wolfgang
>
> I always use \input for the chapters of books - what is the difference
> to component? I looked into the wiki, but didn't get the difference.
see
http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente
if you are familiar with german.
Suppose you have a 1500 pages document, but you really
work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots
of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....
with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but
with correct page numbers and correct references.
With only \input chap7 you have wrong page numbers and
missing references
Herbert
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.246.1353317095.2161.ntg-context@ntg.nl>
2012-11-19 9:47 ` "H. Özoguz"
2012-11-19 10:25 ` Herbert Voss [this message]
[not found] <mailman.5.1353322801.15079.ntg-context@ntg.nl>
2012-11-20 8:20 ` "H. Özoguz"
2012-11-20 8:35 ` Herbert Voss
2012-11-19 8:30 "H. Özoguz"
2012-11-19 8:47 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-11-19 8:56 ` Schmitz Thomas A.
2012-11-19 9:33 ` Hans Hagen
2012-11-19 11:47 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-11-19 12:41 ` Hans Hagen
2012-11-20 10:25 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-11-19 9:35 ` Hans Hagen
2012-11-19 10:55 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-11-19 11:12 ` Herbert Voss
2012-11-19 9:30 ` Marco Patzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AA0927.8060203@FU-Berlin.DE \
--to=herbert.voss@fu-berlin.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).