Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

["H. Özoguz"]

Sorry, I did not get you. I was asking about Context, not Latex?!


m 19.11.2012 12:00, schrieb ntg-context-request@ntg.nl:
> see
> http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente
> if you are familiar with german.
>
> Suppose you have a 1500 pages document,  but you really
> work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots
> of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....
>
> with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but
> with correct page numbers and correct references.
>
> With only \input chap7  you have wrong page numbers and
> missing references
>
> Herbert

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Herbert Voss]

Am 20.11.2012 09:20, schrieb "H. Özoguz":
> Sorry, I did not get you. I was asking about Context, not Latex?!

sure, I only explained the difference of \input and \include
respectively \includeonly and explained only the existing behaviour
in LaTeX. The same should be possible in ConTeXt.

Herbert



> m 19.11.2012 12:00, schrieb ntg-context-request@ntg.nl:
>> see
>> http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente
>> if you are familiar with german.
>>
>> Suppose you have a 1500 pages document,  but you really
>> work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots
>> of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....
>>
>> with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but
>> with correct page numbers and correct references.
>>
>> With only \input chap7  you have wrong page numbers and
>> missing references
>>
>> Herbert
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
> to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>
>

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

On 11/19/2012 01:41 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> that there is a lua error ...
>
> can you try with:
>
>                          if not component or component == componentname
> then
>                              -- skip
>                          else

Hans,

yes, this appears to work! I now get page numbers etc. when I compile 
single components, and I could kick myself for not knowing this earlier...

All best

Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Hans Hagen]

On 11/19/2012 12:47 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 10:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> this is already in place for a while given that one uses the right
>> structures:
>>
>> http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1103.pdf
>
> Oops, sorry, I must have missed this! But I can't get it working. After
> adding
>
> \setupreferencing[autofile=yes]
> \setupinteraction[state=start]
>
> to all components, compiling single components fails with
>
> ! LuaTeX error
> ....text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:902: table
> index is nil
> stack traceback:
>      ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:902: in
> function 'loadproductreferences'
>      ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:1021: in
> function 'loadpresets'
>      ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:1043: in
> function 'useproduct'
>      <main ctx instance>:1: in main chunk.
>
> system          > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: LuaTeX error  ...
>
> Any idea what this might mean?

that there is a lua error ...

can you try with:

                         if not component or component == componentname then
                             -- skip
                         else


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

On 11/19/2012 10:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> this is already in place for a while given that one uses the right
> structures:
>
> http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1103.pdf

Oops, sorry, I must have missed this! But I can't get it working. After 
adding

\setupreferencing[autofile=yes]
\setupinteraction[state=start]

to all components, compiling single components fails with

! LuaTeX error 
...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:902: table index 
is nil
stack traceback:
	...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:902: in 
function 'loadproductreferences'
	...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:1021: in 
function 'loadpresets'
	...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/strc-ref.lua:1043: in 
function 'useproduct'
	<main ctx instance>:1: in main chunk.

system          > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: LuaTeX error  ...

Any idea what this might mean?

All best

Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Herbert Voss]

Wolfgang Schuster schrieb:

>> \startproduct mysmalldocument
>>
>> \component one
>> \component three
>>
>> \stopproduct
>
> This doesn’t the same because with \includeonly the
> chapter/figure/page/etc. counters from the skipped files are honored like
> they do with single component files from Thomas request.

because every file defined with \includeonly gets its own .aux file which
is _aöways_ read by the main tex file. The reason why all page numbers and
refences are correct.

Herbert

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Am 19.11.2012 um 10:35 schrieb Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>:

> On 11/19/2012 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> 
>> Am 19.11.2012 um 09:30 schrieb H. Özoguz <h.oezoguz@mmnetz.de>:
>> 
>>> Is there an equivalent of the LaTeX "\includeonly" ? - I'm working on books (nearly only on books), so such a command would speed up my work.
>> 
>> No there isn’t.
>> 
>> 
>> @Hans: With with \includeonly and \excludeonly command you can specify which external files should be included in the document by the \inlcude{…} (a special version of \input{…}) command.
>> 
>> When you add \includeonly{one,three} in the following example only the files “one.tex” and “three.tex” will be included and the other two are ignored. With \excludeonly{two,three} the files “one.tex” and “four.tex” are read but two and three are ignored.
>> 
>> \startproduct mydocument
>> 
>> \component one
>> \component two
>> \component three
>> \component four
>> 
>> \stopproduct
> 
> \startproduct mysmalldocument
> 
> \component one
> \component three
> 
> \stopproduct

This doesn’t the same because with \includeonly the chapter/figure/page/etc. counters from the skipped files are honored like they do with single component files from Thomas request.

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Herbert Voss]

Am 19.11.2012 10:47, schrieb "H. Özoguz":
>
>> >
>> >\startproduct mydocument
>> >
>> >\component one
>> >\component two
>> >\component three
>> >\component four
>> >
>> >\stopproduct
>> >
>> >Wolfgang
>
> I always use \input for the chapters of books - what is the difference
> to component? I looked into the wiki, but didn't get the difference.

see
http://projekte.dante.de/DanteFAQ/GrosseDokumente
if you are familiar with german.

Suppose you have a 1500 pages document,  but you really
work only on the 7th chapter which has 30 pages with lots
of references to other chapters/sectionb/images/....

with \includeonly{chap7} you get a 30 pages document but
with correct page numbers and correct references.

With only \input chap7  you have wrong page numbers and
missing references

Herbert
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

["H. Özoguz"]

> >
> >\startproduct mydocument
> >
> >\component one
> >\component two
> >\component three
> >\component four
> >
> >\stopproduct
> >
> >Wolfgang

I always use \input for the chapters of books - what is the difference to component? I looked into the wiki, but didn't get the difference.

Huseyin


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Hans Hagen]

On 11/19/2012 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> Am 19.11.2012 um 09:30 schrieb H. Özoguz <h.oezoguz@mmnetz.de>:
>
>> Is there an equivalent of the LaTeX "\includeonly" ? - I'm working on books (nearly only on books), so such a command would speed up my work.
>
> No there isn’t.
>
>
> @Hans: With with \includeonly and \excludeonly command you can specify which external files should be included in the document by the \inlcude{…} (a special version of \input{…}) command.
>
> When you add \includeonly{one,three} in the following example only the files “one.tex” and “three.tex” will be included and the other two are ignored. With \excludeonly{two,three} the files “one.tex” and “four.tex” are read but two and three are ignored.
>
> \startproduct mydocument
>
> \component one
> \component two
> \component three
> \component four
>
> \stopproduct

\startproduct mysmalldocument

\component one
\component three

\stopproduct



-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Hans Hagen]

On 11/19/2012 9:56 AM, Schmitz Thomas A. wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Schuster <wolfgang.schuster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No there isn’t.
>>
>>
>> @Hans: With with \includeonly and \excludeonly command you can specify which external files should be included in the document by the \inlcude{…} (a special version of \input{…}) command.
>>
>> When you add \includeonly{one,three} in the following example only the files “one.tex” and “three.tex” will be included and the other two are ignored. With \excludeonly{two,three} the files “one.tex” and “four..tex” are read but two and three are ignored.
>>
>> \startproduct mydocument
>>
>> \component one
>> \component two
>> \component three
>> \component four
>>
>> \stopproduct
>>
>> Wolfgang
>> _________
>
> That reminds me: at the context meeting 2011, we talked about the possibility of retaining page numbers, cross-references, etc. when compiling just one component. Hans. you, said this wasn't too complex (because all the information is already there in the tuc file). Is this possible now, or can we have that in the near future? :-)

this is already in place for a while given that one uses the right 
structures:

http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1103.pdf

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Marco Patzer]

2012-11-19 H. Özoguz:

> Is there an equivalent of the LaTeX "\includeonly" ?

You can place individual chapters in components and use the mode
mechanism:

  \startproduct *

  \startmodeset
    [alpha] {\component [alpha]}
    [beta]  {\component [beta]}
    [gamma] {\component [gamma]}
  \stopmodeset

  \stopproduct

Then compile with `context --mode=alpha,gamma main.tex`.

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Project_structure


Marco

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Schmitz Thomas A.]

On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Schuster <wolfgang.schuster@gmail.com> wrote:

> No there isn’t.
> 
> 
> @Hans: With with \includeonly and \excludeonly command you can specify which external files should be included in the document by the \inlcude{…} (a special version of \input{…}) command.
> 
> When you add \includeonly{one,three} in the following example only the files “one.tex” and “three.tex” will be included and the other two are ignored. With \excludeonly{two,three} the files “one.tex” and “four.tex” are read but two and three are ignored.
> 
> \startproduct mydocument
> 
> \component one
> \component two
> \component three
> \component four
> 
> \stopproduct
> 
> Wolfgang
> _________

That reminds me: at the context meeting 2011, we talked about the possibility of retaining page numbers, cross-references, etc. when compiling just one component. Hans. you, said this wasn't too complex (because all the information is already there in the tuc file). Is this possible now, or can we have that in the near future? :-)

Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Equivalent of Includeonly?

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Am 19.11.2012 um 09:30 schrieb H. Özoguz <h.oezoguz@mmnetz.de>:

> Is there an equivalent of the LaTeX "\includeonly" ? - I'm working on books (nearly only on books), so such a command would speed up my work.

No there isn’t.


@Hans: With with \includeonly and \excludeonly command you can specify which external files should be included in the document by the \inlcude{…} (a special version of \input{…}) command.

When you add \includeonly{one,three} in the following example only the files “one.tex” and “three.tex” will be included and the other two are ignored. With \excludeonly{two,three} the files “one.tex” and “four.tex” are read but two and three are ignored.

\startproduct mydocument

\component one
\component two
\component three
\component four

\stopproduct

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Equivalent of Includeonly?

["H. Özoguz"]

Is there an equivalent of the LaTeX "\includeonly" ? - I'm working on 
books (nearly only on books), so such a command would speed up my work.

Huseyin
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________