From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Error markers for invalid section references
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:56:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EB4495.2010601@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107120235.GR11551@homerow>
On 1/7/2013 1:02 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the final stage of a document I always run a grep for ?? and
> xxxx on the document to find invalid references and missing
> bibliography entries.
>
> However, in documents that do not have a section number the
> references to the number are also wrong, they need to be references
> to the name instead of the number. In this case no error marker is
> printed and AFAIK not even a hint in the log file. The correct way
> is to use \about instead of \in. Here's an example:
>
> \setuphead [section] [number=no]
> \starttext
>
> \startsectionlevel [title=Alpha]
> See section \in[invalid]. \par %% prints ??
> See section \in[sec:bar]. \par %% prints nothing
> See section \about[sec:bar]. %% correct reference
>
> \startsectionlevel [title=Foo]
> \stopsectionlevel
> \startsectionlevel [title=Bar, reference=sec:bar]
> \stopsectionlevel
> \stopsectionlevel
>
> \stoptext
>
> The wrong \in[invalid] reference receives an easy to find error
> marker and an entry in the log file. The wrong entry \in[sec:bar] is
> hard to find.
>
> Is there a way to add ?? for those cases as well?
I'll print an !! although it might become optional at some point if I
find that it has unwanted side effects.
Hans
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 12:02 Marco Patzer
2013-01-07 21:56 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2013-01-07 22:06 ` Marco Patzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EB4495.2010601@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).