From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: math: ± and ∓ are shifted
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:46:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515ED5BB.3060005@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515E7E23.4090804@wxs.nl>
On 4/5/2013 9:32 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/5/2013 2:16 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:55:40AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi context list,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> the + signs are at the same height. But this looks strange and
>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed. These look very odd. I tested this with cambria and the
>>>>>> outcome
>>>>>> is similar, so this is not a font bug, but something wrong in
>>>>>> ConTeXt's
>>>>>> math handling.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure if I understand the issue
>>>>>
>>>>> - lm has + and - touching with the + in the same position as the
>>>>> regular +
>>>>>
>>>>> - cambria has a gap between + and - and moves the + up and down
>>>>>
>>>>> Afaik context isn't doing any magic here as these are precomposed
>>>>> glyphs that directly map.
>>>>>
>>>>> $a \ruledhbox{$+$} b \ruledhbox{$-$} c$
>>>>>
>>>>> $a \ruledhbox{$±$} b \ruledhbox{$∓$} c$
>>>>>
>>>>> they are 'binary' in math mode, just like + and -
>>>>
>>>> The question is not about the shape of the glyph, but their location.
>>>> But after looking at the output of latex for CM and Cambria, I am no
>>>> longer sure what the correct output should be. For Cambria, ConTeXt and
>>>> LaTeX give similar outputs. For CM/LM they give different outputs.
>>>
>>> it looks like the open type version has a fitting boundingbox while
>>> the type 1 variants have a bit of the + sticking out:
>>
>> CFF fonts do not store bounding box info anywhere, the engine just
>> calculates it based on glyph outlines. For TFM fonts the metrics can be
>> adjusted to achieve specific alignment.
>
> Sure, but one can 'cheat' with the boundingboxes as they're not cropboxes.
>
> It's no big deal to adapt some metrics in mkiv, but best have the font
> do the job.
Experimental in beta:
\definefontfeature [lm-math] [mathdimensions=signs]
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=10pt]
$x \ruledhbox{$\pm$} x \ruledhbox{$\mp$} x$
\stopTEXpage
\stoptext
(explanation in font manual, not yet uploaded)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 21:36 Xenia
2013-04-04 21:44 ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-04-04 22:06 ` Hans Hagen
2013-04-04 22:13 ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-04-04 22:55 ` Hans Hagen
2013-04-05 0:16 ` Khaled Hosny
2013-04-05 7:32 ` Hans Hagen
2013-04-05 13:46 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515ED5BB.3060005@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).