From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/83786 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: slow compilation? Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:55:13 +0200 Message-ID: <52093DA1.9080205@wxs.nl> References: <52090FFB.8020001@web.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376337352 15275 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2013 19:55:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Aug 12 21:55:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V8yDZ-0008Al-Oe for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:55:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA5B101EC; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:55:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LQc14tBtrSlU; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:54:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD97101E9; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:54:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837B3101E9 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:54:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5yVMp3fbVgp1 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:54:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter5-til.mf.surf.net (filter5-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.221]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D671A101E6 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:54:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter5-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r7CJtbGj021992 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:55:38 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.103; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.103] (unverified [10.100.1.103]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 6.3c2) with ESMTP id 1181-1713362 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:55:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <52090FFB.8020001@web.de> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=15; city=Zwolle; latitude=52.5058; longitude=6.0858; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5058,6.0858&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0WKbTTBeR - e0165cec0cd9 - 20130812 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.221 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:83786 Archived-At: On 8/12/2013 6:40 PM, Pablo Rodr=EDguez wrote: > Dear list, > > although I cannot find it now, I sent a message to the list describing > that I suspected ConTeXt wasn=92t as fast as it should on my computer. > > Here you have a minimal sample: > > \starttext > \input knuth > \stoptext > > It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the > standard required time? > > Actually what I wonder is why the compilation requires three runs to > output the final document. mkiv lua stats > runtime: 0.250 seconds system | total runtime: 0.422 luajittex: mkiv lua stats > runtime: 0.200 seconds system | total runtime: 0.360 Dell Laptop: i7-3840QM @ 2.8G / 16 GB / 256G SSD / windows 8 64 bit \starttext \dorecurse{1000}{test\page} \stoptext does 540 pages per second of course in practice it all depends on what features are used but 3.5 = seconds is way off, unless you remake the format each run (coul dbe the = case of your luatex doesn't match texlua Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________