From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/83925 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: LuajitTeX fails to load font Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: <521801E4.3050901@wxs.nl> References: <20130823211450.GL18239@homerow> <5217F63D.3080507@wxs.nl> <20130824002505.GN18239@homerow> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377305100 13229 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2013 00:45:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:45:00 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Aug 24 02:45:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VD1yR-0004HD-Nd for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:45:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090F610229; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zuM9bf9aGfwM; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6691510225; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6859D10225 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GSFUJr4c+VF3 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-til.mf.surf.net (filter3-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.219]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A1A1021D for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:43:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter3-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r7O0ilum000872 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:44:48 +0200 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.104; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.104] (unverified [10.100.1.104]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 6.3c2) with ESMTP id 2659-1713362 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:44:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <20130824002505.GN18239@homerow> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=15; city=Zwolle; latitude=52.5058; longitude=6.0858; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5058,6.0858&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 06KgoILva - 96eb99512219 - 20130824 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.219 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:83925 Archived-At: On 8/24/2013 2:25 AM, Marco Patzer wrote: > On 2013=9608=9624 Hans Hagen wrote: > >> Hard to say what is the issue but it is not a luajittex issue. We >> don't do anything special, for instance jit is turned off because >> there is no gain at all (actually with jit enabled, the run is >> slower). > > I can confirm that. I did not find a real-world document which > compiled faster with jit. Using the virtual machine provides between > 8% and 25% speed gain here. there is a bit more to gain otherwise (luigi and i will talk about speed = related issues at the context meeting) >> There is however one difference and that is the compiled lua code: >> lua and luajit have incompatible formats (apart from the fact that >> luatex is 5.2 and luajittex is 5.1++). Normally compilation happens >> automatically i.e. when a font is loaded by luatex, context will >> generate the relevant compiled file when luajittex is used. >> >> One possibility is that there is some mismatch in version numbers >> that gets unnoticed. > > Let me know if I can provide any additional info. ok, but currently i have no clue (it might be that there has been a fix without jumping the internal otf = handler version number, in which case a mismatch can go unnoticed and no = recompile happens in the jit variant) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________