ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Huttar <lars_huttar@sil.org>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: question about linespace adjustment
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:01:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5241B74E.3030403@sil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5241A380.8050608@sil.org>

Aditya wrote,
> Contrast
>
> {\switchtobodyfont[14pt] \input ward \endgraf}
>
> with
>
> {\tfc \input ward \endgraf}
>

Thanks for your help. You've left me to draw my own conclusions from
this example, so I'll say what I think this implies, and please correct
me if I'm wrong.

(Note to other non-TeXnichians: \endgraf is a TeX synonym for \par: end
of paragraph.)

I think the principle that you're trying to demonstrate is that the
answer to my last paragraph is yes: there is an important distinction
between "making a font switch," e.g. \tfc, and "using a new body font",
of which \switchtobodyfont is apparently an example.
Namely, that the latter causes the interlinespace to be automatically
adjusted, whereas the former doesn't unless you explicitly use
\setupinterlinespace.

Can you explain how/why the two ways of increasing the font size should
have such different effects? (I have read section 5.8 and 5.9 about
selecting bodyfonts and interlinespace but still don't get it.)
\tfc is described as a "font selector" command (5.3.2). It seems to me
that both \tfc and \switchtobodyfont[20pt] simply attempt to switch to a
different size of whatever bodyfont is currently in effect. But there
must be something I'm missing. (Or else it's just an arbitrary
distinction, but that seems unlikely.)

Lars

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-24 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-24 14:36 Lars Huttar
2013-09-24 14:51 ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-24 16:01 ` Lars Huttar [this message]
2013-09-24 17:45   ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-24 18:18     ` luigi scarso
2013-09-24 21:07       ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-24 21:25         ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-25 19:54           ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-25 21:00             ` luigi scarso
2013-09-25 21:02             ` Wolfgang Schuster
2013-09-25 21:45               ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-26 19:47                 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2013-09-27 15:57                   ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-30 20:22                   ` Lars Huttar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5241B74E.3030403@sil.org \
    --to=lars_huttar@sil.org \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).