From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/84404 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Huttar Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: question about linespace adjustment Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:45:55 -0400 Message-ID: <5241CFD3.4020008@sil.org> References: <5241A380.8050608@sil.org> <5241B74E.3030403@sil.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380044765 30537 80.91.229.3 (24 Sep 2013 17:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:46:05 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Sep 24 19:46:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VOWgb-0005Un-EE for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63950101EF; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:44:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iLKETrnRD3rz; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:44:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2438C101E5; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:44:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2371101E5 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:43:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id R7rC7lSdV7cs for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-utr.mf.surf.net (filter3-utr.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.154]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02325101DE for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com (mail-yh0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) by filter3-utr.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r8OHjvDJ007472 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:45:59 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t59so2115840yho.38 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tjGMCqmDJahMseEcSY8e6QzAHNFbeCRagyBG78IeDdA=; b=WnlBA2QtOjABpkUcP11Sj/2OVa2LuQcKZQUMhNtCA/4Xp37pak2e4ppKMZKy4qacqf wihSTPFpvimIQ6QKnKdZvy+yOkMODy7BuLbmbRzw/aF1wkZs5ApsWH54eXMT177TsExx Yk6/qjVE8YGIh0Sd8fAsTRVkJh+4F4FzTZLg49BvGpVI4ZR/vD2OrJRf6sAlYJngyX3m eOyjISi8IJiwPX7IxGF+QNxn5bPKtQ29R/YqwdC/wndpdjwYIYGwoi6ecZZ8SqErWQMr MNu1AR5iwfuMmPwviogi0Nu+y0rrgmOpr7dQYY9IEMNV0h2H4rzU3cXXCEUUtjt9BxjT z5SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVQWURSYCjwzkjtPDfxFtdlayDTo+sD5xsfELFHwXo5F1VLVVyeZuaI7sfeB7SqZSR5VGM X-Received: by 10.236.58.202 with SMTP id q50mr2166186yhc.38.1380044756832; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [172.22.6.6] ([162.40.29.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j67sm27255941yhe.26.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <5241B74E.3030403@sil.org> X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.213.51; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 08Kt5JVbm - 57b500bb150c - 20130924 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.154 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:84404 Archived-At: On 9/24/2013 12:01 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: > > Can you explain how/why the two ways of increasing the font size should > have such different effects? (I have read section 5.8 and 5.9 about > selecting bodyfonts and interlinespace but still don't get it.) > \tfc is described as a "font selector" command (5.3.2). It seems to me > that both \tfc and \switchtobodyfont[20pt] simply attempt to switch to a > different size of whatever bodyfont is currently in effect. But there > must be something I'm missing. (Or else it's just an arbitrary > distinction, but that seems unlikely.) > > Is it that \switchdobodyfont changes the *body* font, which engages the associated bodyfont environment... whereas \tfc changes the *font*, not the *body* font? Lars ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________