From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/84459 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Huttar Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: question about linespace adjustment Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:57:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5245AAD6.7070204@sil.org> References: <5241A380.8050608@sil.org> <5241B74E.3030403@sil.org> <5241CFD3.4020008@sil.org> <5241FF01.1020604@sil.org> <52433F76.30905@sil.org> <52435995.1000706@sil.org> <09C77DBA-53B8-4040-971E-B649D2545473@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380297448 14668 80.91.229.3 (27 Sep 2013 15:57:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users To: Wolfgang Schuster Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 27 17:57:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VPaQ3-00077A-Bq for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:57:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24B5101DE; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6Tp+swbSMEIQ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59502101E6; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A57E101E6 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LLHr53mHAmbS for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter1-utr.mf.surf.net (filter1-utr.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.152]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6174C101DE for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com (mail-yh0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) by filter1-utr.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r8RFvCPB032307 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:57:14 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b6so1030700yha.16 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:57:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C/Jh2/EUTKvSjPX/L2U/ALdpQZgla6lW7avxVsbKN0I=; b=Y6vXM8JsvG2h2ywTWBb5SIEslPzFPAKYo9VGMYRLGeaEVDpRiLz4PM5u63lJQr7fMG Oyi2ToWNT2g7eE2n1VcwlnU7lAbT+NiBCJUKTI5PjbkbxFFITH7nubhQAL6xQcKymGpt aFTnikPGanBQi9yFRmNPJ6tB2tDPZrkF5MkVxIDcsOAxODxhN9HzdhjHHO4YMTx5FC63 44UpvGPaB5TholTQ/00H5syF+tgpJUW+zWfB0NZKLwVuPELVWaW8KF5hvjdeht4v/H6Z RY9ocl5qM/jYCSFeAfd4Bs0rd/and/dBBGI8xr8mIYJiQN+1ixRF7hqGlTl5Byo+7yZ/ G3mA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYJDfdZ973alOKpNu1omB/mKgx9IYVVByorr7WlpOV/LD3Od8BdzDuDYZBXkQ+Eqo2IVfq X-Received: by 10.236.45.102 with SMTP id o66mr7263753yhb.13.1380297431955; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [172.22.6.6] ([162.40.29.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm11887133yhk.16.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <09C77DBA-53B8-4040-971E-B649D2545473@gmail.com> X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.213.43; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 07KufVcy2 - ae9f1fc40dd7 - 20130927 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:84459 Archived-At: On 9/26/2013 3:47 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Am 25.09.2013 um 23:45 schrieb Lars Huttar : > >> Wolfgang, thanks for your response. >> >> On 9/25/2013 5:02 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >>> You can=92t expect from \tfa etc. to change the interlinespace because = these >>> commands can be used in your paragraphs to change the size of certain >>> words only and in this case you don=92t want a forced change of the int= erlinespace. >> Well... \switchtobodyfont[20pt] can also be used in paragraphs to change >> the size of just a few words. >> But the above suggests that \switchtobodyfont shouldn't be used for that >> purpose, and commands like \tfc should? > You can use \switchtobodyfont to change the size for certain parts of a t= ext > but it=92s best to keep this to a minimum because \tfa etc. are a lot fa= ster. > > The reason why you don=92t need \setupinterlinespace when you use > \switchtobodyfont is that \setupinterlinespace is already called by > \switchtobodyfont. OK, good to know. > Another thing which shouldn=92t be forgotten is that \switchtobodyfont > controls and changes the sizes for \tfa etc. Can you elaborate on that? A few days ago, Luigi wrote, > \tfc augment the fontsize of a factor of 1.728 > It's relative to the default font size not to the current fontsize So when he says "relative to the default font size", does that mean the same thing as "relative to the current body font size"? I think so. The following example shows that the function of \tfc is relative to the size set by \switchtobodyfont: {\tfc tfc \tfc tfc} {\switchtobodyfont[20pt] 20pt \tfc tfc} {\switchtobodyfont[6pt] 6pt \tfc tfc} Here the text after \tfc appears in three different sizes, proportional to (and larger than) the \switchtobodyfont setting in effect. However, the first line shows us that \tfc is *not* affected by previous effects of \tfc. So as Luigi said, there is a distinction between the current font size (which is affected by \tfc), and the "default font size" -- or maybe it should be described as "the current body font size" -- which is not affected by \tfc. Is that correct? So does \tfc mean "set the current font size to be three steps up from the current body font size"? Thanks. I'm contributing clarifications into the manual as I come to understand how things are designed to work. Lars ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________