Re: luatex or luajittex?

[Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>]

On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>>
>>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
>>> specific functionality
>>>
>>> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already a binary for
>>> windows, as Akira always provides the latest greatest)
>>>
>>> (and as usual the jit version is some 20% faster due to the faster Lua vm)
>>
>> Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
>>
>> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
>> be broken.
> 
> Which one? 32-bit or 64-bit linux (linux or linux-64)?

Many thanks for the reply, Mojca.

Linux 32-bits is my architecture.

> I failed to automatically compile 32-bit binaries (and I would have to
> remember how to switch the compiler and simply didn't care enough at
> the time to take the effort + we have problems with weirdly
> misbehaving subversion without proper understanding what could go
> wrong, so some binary builders weren't even able to submit their
> binaries). If that fails it might be due to version mismatch which
> means that I need to build the binary first.

I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.

Many thanks for your reply,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________