From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/86774 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: much slower compilation with latest beta Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:07 +0100 Message-ID: <5330D58F.5080103@wxs.nl> References: <53308898.6090406@gmx.es> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395709342 20834 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2014 01:02:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 01:02:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Mar 25 02:02:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSFl9-0001zI-JI for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2E8101EF; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7KZAjhmPAjCR; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455BE101E9; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF3101E9 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JIcOyE8QCeCu for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:24 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (filter2-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.70]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56B3101E8 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:14 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp.ziggozakelijk.nl (D57D1DA2.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.29.162]) by filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s2P12EKH005197 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:14 +0100 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=10.100.1.104; Original-Received: from [10.100.1.104] (unverified [10.100.1.104]) by pragma-net.nl (SurgeMail 6.3c2) with ESMTP id 8246-1713362 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:02:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <53308898.6090406@gmx.es> X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-9 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: ntg-context@ntg.nl, base:default, @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=213.125.29.162; country=NL; region=Provincie Overijssel; city=Zwolle; latitude=52.5058; longitude=6.0858; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5058,6.0858&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0QLFB2eE1 - 25c8dc17bc83 - 20140325 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.70 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:86774 Archived-At: On 3/24/2014 8:33 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Hans, > > I=92m afraid there might be something wrong with beta from 2014.03.24 00:= 52. > > With a book I=92m writing, either in complete (from a previous --purgeall) > or partial (from previous .tuc and .log files) compilation, the latest > beta needs 8 runs to compile a document. It takes about 140 secs with > luatex and about 100 with luajittex. Document source is exactly the same > in all cases. > > The same document with beta from 2014.03.07 11:42 (sorry, I don=92t have > the previous beta) requires a single run for a partial compilation which > about 12 secs. Total compilation needs 4 runs that take about 50 secs. > > I think that the same may happen with the ConTeXt reference manual. > Since compilation is not direct, all statistics I can provide is that it > took 358.491 secs with latest beta from 2014.03.24 00:52. and 296.778 > secs with previous beta from 2014.03.07 11:42. i noticed it too .. 8 runs indicates tuc file cycling .. fix tomorrow (normally context gets faster -) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________