much slower compilation with latest beta

much slower compilation with latest beta

[Pablo Rodriguez]

Hans,

I’m afraid there might be something wrong with beta from 2014.03.24 00:52.

With a book I’m writing, either in complete (from a previous --purgeall)
or partial (from previous .tuc and .log files) compilation, the latest
beta needs 8 runs to compile a document. It takes about 140 secs with
luatex and about 100 with luajittex. Document source is exactly the same
in all cases.

The same document with beta from 2014.03.07 11:42 (sorry, I don’t have
the previous beta) requires a single run for a partial compilation which
about 12 secs. Total compilation needs 4 runs that take about 50 secs.

I think that the same may happen with the ConTeXt reference manual.
Since compilation is not direct, all statistics I can provide is that it
took 358.491 secs with latest beta from 2014.03.24 00:52. and 296.778
secs with previous beta from 2014.03.07 11:42.

I guess there might be a bug here.

Many thanks for your help,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: much slower compilation with latest beta

[Hans Hagen]

On 3/24/2014 8:33 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Hans,
>
> I’m afraid there might be something wrong with beta from 2014.03.24 00:52.
>
> With a book I’m writing, either in complete (from a previous --purgeall)
> or partial (from previous .tuc and .log files) compilation, the latest
> beta needs 8 runs to compile a document. It takes about 140 secs with
> luatex and about 100 with luajittex. Document source is exactly the same
> in all cases.
>
> The same document with beta from 2014.03.07 11:42 (sorry, I don’t have
> the previous beta) requires a single run for a partial compilation which
> about 12 secs. Total compilation needs 4 runs that take about 50 secs.
>
> I think that the same may happen with the ConTeXt reference manual.
> Since compilation is not direct, all statistics I can provide is that it
> took 358.491 secs with latest beta from 2014.03.24 00:52. and 296.778
> secs with previous beta from 2014.03.07 11:42.

i noticed it too .. 8 runs indicates tuc file cycling .. fix tomorrow

(normally context gets faster -)

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: much slower compilation with latest beta

[Pablo Rodriguez]

On 03/25/2014 02:02 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 3/24/2014 8:33 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> I think that the same may happen with the ConTeXt reference manual.
>> Since compilation is not direct, all statistics I can provide is that it
>> took 358.491 secs with latest beta from 2014.03.24 00:52. and 296.778
>> secs with previous beta from 2014.03.07 11:42.
> 
> i noticed it too .. 8 runs indicates tuc file cycling .. fix tomorrow
> 
> (normally context gets faster -)

Many thanks for your fast fix, Hans.


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________