ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Asciidoc to PDF over Context
@ 2015-02-12 21:18 Tobias Famulla
  2015-02-13  8:42 ` luigi scarso
  2015-02-13  8:53 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Famulla @ 2015-02-12 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2003 bytes --]

Hello Mailing-List,

I used Latex for a few years in university to create reports for
assignments and also to write my bachelor thesis (I would have liked to
use Context, but the right schema for citation was not available and I
had no time to create it myself).
Over the time I got a little bit frustrated with Latex, because it has
many modules and most of the time gets the job done, but writing Latex
can sometimes be quite hard sometime to me (you have to have the modules
installed, tweak around with charactersets, imagepositioning, ...).

In between I looked at much smaller and sleaker document representations
languages (asciidoc, restructuredText, Markdown) and writing in it is a
pleasure compared to Latex (I haven't really tried out Context but
looked over the documentation and it looked more promising but shares
the same design ideas).
Asciidoc is even able to declarate source code listings and formulas.
Never the less, the output to Pdf is not always the nicest one.

The reason why I now write to this list, is, that I imagine, that
Context could be the right processor to create beautiful PDFs out of
intermediate formats (DocBook 5 or Asciidoc). For the conversion to
Latex a module for asciidoctor (ruby implementation) is in developement.
The ideal system I imagine would be close to what is used with HTML and
CSS on the web: Having a easy to use file format to writing you
documents (Asciidoc or DocBook as intermediate format) and a system to
create the PDFs (maybe Context and a Context-Template)

So my main questions are:
- Are there straigt forward ways to create PDFs with Context using
Docbook 5?
- Are there "not that hard" possibilites to write extentions to Context
to do exactly that (maybe using Lua)?
- Does it make more sense, when using another input format like
Asciidoc, to write a converter which directly creates a
Context-document? (although it might be more versatile to use DocBook
for other formats like Markdown or DocBook itself)

Sincerely,

Tobias


[-- Attachment #2: uni.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 121 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:Tobias Famulla
n:Famulla;Tobias
email;internet:uni@famulla.eu
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Asciidoc to PDF over Context
  2015-02-12 21:18 Asciidoc to PDF over Context Tobias Famulla
@ 2015-02-13  8:42 ` luigi scarso
  2015-02-13 20:42   ` Jan Tosovsky
  2015-02-13  8:53 ` Hans Hagen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: luigi scarso @ 2015-02-13  8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2651 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Tobias Famulla <uni@famulla.eu> wrote:

> Hello Mailing-List,
>
> I used Latex for a few years in university to create reports for
> assignments and also to write my bachelor thesis (I would have liked to
> use Context, but the right schema for citation was not available and I
> had no time to create it myself).
> Over the time I got a little bit frustrated with Latex, because it has
> many modules and most of the time gets the job done, but writing Latex
> can sometimes be quite hard sometime to me (you have to have the modules
> installed, tweak around with charactersets, imagepositioning, ...).
>
> In between I looked at much smaller and sleaker document representations
> languages (asciidoc, restructuredText, Markdown) and writing in it is a
> pleasure compared to Latex (I haven't really tried out Context but
> looked over the documentation and it looked more promising but shares
> the same design ideas).
> Asciidoc is even able to declarate source code listings and formulas.
> Never the less, the output to Pdf is not always the nicest one.
>
> The reason why I now write to this list, is, that I imagine, that
> Context could be the right processor to create beautiful PDFs out of
> intermediate formats (DocBook 5 or Asciidoc). For the conversion to
> Latex a module for asciidoctor (ruby implementation) is in developement.
> The ideal system I imagine would be close to what is used with HTML and
> CSS on the web: Having a easy to use file format to writing you
> documents (Asciidoc or DocBook as intermediate format) and a system to
> create the PDFs (maybe Context and a Context-Template)
>
> So my main questions are:
> - Are there straigt forward ways to create PDFs with Context using
> Docbook 5?
> - Are there "not that hard" possibilites to write extentions to Context
> to do exactly that (maybe using Lua)?
> - Does it make more sense, when using another input format like
> Asciidoc, to write a converter which directly creates a
> Context-document? (although it might be more versatile to use DocBook
> for other formats like Markdown or DocBook itself)
>
> Context alredy has a kind of xslt processor written in lpeg and embedded
into the format.
--- see  for example http://wiki.contextgarden.net/XML
The DocBook is a huge specification, so
I guess that a convert for ConTeXt takes a huge amount of work if you want
to map everything --- but it is feasible if you plan to start with a small
subset.
From this point of view, Docbook already has a xslt to latex,
so  working on a xslt to context maybe makes more sense, if one accepts
that context is still evolving.


-- 
luigi

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3398 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Asciidoc to PDF over Context
  2015-02-12 21:18 Asciidoc to PDF over Context Tobias Famulla
  2015-02-13  8:42 ` luigi scarso
@ 2015-02-13  8:53 ` Hans Hagen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2015-02-13  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On 2/12/2015 10:18 PM, Tobias Famulla wrote:
> Hello Mailing-List,
>
> I used Latex for a few years in university to create reports for
> assignments and also to write my bachelor thesis (I would have liked to
> use Context, but the right schema for citation was not available and I
> had no time to create it myself).
> Over the time I got a little bit frustrated with Latex, because it has
> many modules and most of the time gets the job done, but writing Latex
> can sometimes be quite hard sometime to me (you have to have the modules
> installed, tweak around with charactersets, imagepositioning, ...).
>
> In between I looked at much smaller and sleaker document representations
> languages (asciidoc, restructuredText, Markdown) and writing in it is a
> pleasure compared to Latex (I haven't really tried out Context but
> looked over the documentation and it looked more promising but shares
> the same design ideas).
> Asciidoc is even able to declarate source code listings and formulas.
> Never the less, the output to Pdf is not always the nicest one.
>
> The reason why I now write to this list, is, that I imagine, that
> Context could be the right processor to create beautiful PDFs out of
> intermediate formats (DocBook 5 or Asciidoc). For the conversion to
> Latex a module for asciidoctor (ruby implementation) is in developement.
> The ideal system I imagine would be close to what is used with HTML and
> CSS on the web: Having a easy to use file format to writing you
> documents (Asciidoc or DocBook as intermediate format) and a system to
> create the PDFs (maybe Context and a Context-Template)
>
> So my main questions are:
> - Are there straigt forward ways to create PDFs with Context using
> Docbook 5?

it's not too hard to implement but so far i never ran into docbook files 
(so it's mostly lack of momentum / motivation / reason)

> - Are there "not that hard" possibilites to write extentions to Context
> to do exactly that (maybe using Lua)?

docbook is just xml and as we process quite complex ml here i guess it 
should be doable within the current functionality

> - Does it make more sense, when using another input format like
> Asciidoc, to write a converter which directly creates a
> Context-document? (although it might be more versatile to use DocBook
> for other formats like Markdown or DocBook itself)

it depends on your documents ... as soon as you need more structure, 
more control over how it has to look typeset, the advantage of light 
coding quickly disappears; and even if there are escapes the coding then 
looks pretty bad compared to a clean tex (or xml) source

(these ascii based codings remind me of university times long ago, when 
i wrote some basic formatting / pagination code using simple directives 
so that we could handle our thesis on those terminals ... i must have 
the (pascal) source someplace ... a couple of years later I found out 
that on those vax machines there could have been tex running)

> Sincerely,
>
> Tobias
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Asciidoc to PDF over Context
  2015-02-13  8:42 ` luigi scarso
@ 2015-02-13 20:42   ` Jan Tosovsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Tosovsky @ 2015-02-13 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'mailing list for ConTeXt users'

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]

On 2015-02-13 luigi scarso wrote:
> On 2015-02-12 Tobias Famulla <uni@famulla.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Context could be the right processor to create beautiful
> > PDFs out of intermediate formats (DocBook 5 or Asciidoc).
> 
> The DocBook is a huge specification, so I guess that a convert 
> for ConTeXt takes a huge amount of work if you want to map 
> everything --- but it is feasible if you plan to start with
> a small subset.
>
> From this point of view, Docbook already has a xslt to latex

DocBook has even ConTeXt output
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dblatex/files/dbcontext/

Actually it produces quite obsolete syntax, but it is a good starting point
for further tweaking. Exactly this I did in my recent project.

While my resources are very limited, if any effort in this field will start,
I can share my DocBook/XSLT experience. It could also be a nice GSoC project
for students:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201501/msg00027.html

Btw, I prefer DocBook over lightweight markup languages (Markdown, Asciidoc)
as latter lack semantics and advanced structuring, which may be limiting in
some projects requiring advanced formatting.

Jan

[-- Attachment #2: winmail.dat --]
[-- Type: application/ms-tnef, Size: 2726 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-13 20:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-12 21:18 Asciidoc to PDF over Context Tobias Famulla
2015-02-13  8:42 ` luigi scarso
2015-02-13 20:42   ` Jan Tosovsky
2015-02-13  8:53 ` Hans Hagen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).