From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: Problem with rfc4180splitter in last beta (sticking point was found... maybe)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 21:40:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557F2A21.8010307@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557F17F2.2020904@gyza.cz>
On 6/15/2015 8:22 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> Hello Hans.
> I tried to find differences in beta compared to a fully functional
> version of the TL 2014 and I found two changes in the file-utils prs.lua
> compared to a fully functional version of utils-prs.lua in the TL 2014
> version of ConTeXt:
>
> Changes in file utils-prs.lua (beta version) compared to TL 2014 (fully
> functional version):
>
> line no 520 of beta standalone:
> specification = specification and
> setmetatableindex(specification,defaultspecification) or
> defaultspecification
>
> while the TL 2014 version line no 478:
> specification = specification and
> table.setmetatableindex(specification,defaultspecification) or
> defaultspecification
that ons is irrelevant
> and next diference:
>
> line no 533 of beta standalone:
> local wholeblob = Ct((newline^(specification.strict and -1 or 1) *
> record)^0)
>
> while the TL 2014 version line no 491:
> local wholeblob = Ct((newline^-1 * record)^0)
>
>
> When I change these lines and regenerate ConTeXt format then suddenly
> it works as expected. Of course, you will probably need to make some
> adjustments depending on your idea of a line 533rd.
>
> I hope this information helps a little in search of a problem.
it was on user request that it was changed
the two lines look nearly the same, apart from:
specification.strict and -1 or 1
so, if you pass a specification with strict = true then you get the
behaviour you want
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 8:45 Problem with rfc4180splitter in last beta? Jaroslav Hajtmar
2015-06-15 9:00 ` Jaroslav Hajtmar
2015-06-15 9:47 ` Jaroslav Hajtmar
2015-06-15 18:22 ` Problem with rfc4180splitter in last beta (sticking point was found... maybe) Jaroslav Hajtmar
2015-06-15 19:40 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2015-06-15 20:28 ` Jaroslav Hajtmar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557F2A21.8010307@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).