Hi Dillon,

First of all, I'm against defining such a complex macro, since that can 
be very
confusing when you use it. I personal prefer the key-value definition:
\def\DEFINETEST[#1]{%
   \getXXXparameters
     [paraA=defaultValueForParameterA%
     ,paraB=% or just empty
     ,#1]%
   \doSomethingWith[\XXXparameter\paraA]%
   \doSomethingElse...
}
You might want to refer to the following link and other valuable 
materials on the
wiki for more information:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/System_Macros/Key_Value_Assignments

If you insist on that, I guess you can define a temporary macro inside 
your macro.
That's very dirty, but can be a little more efficient? I'm not sure.

I was given to understand that the ConTeXt MKVI now accepts parameters 
such as
#position#color rather than meaningless #1#2. I GUESS that's lua-based, 
so maybe
it'll break the TeX limitation.

On 07/05/2015 09:55 AM, 土卜皿 wrote:
>
> hi, all
>
> For testing, I have a definition:
>
> |\define[9]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9}|
>
> |context test| can work fine, when I modify the above into:
>
> |\define[10]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10}|
>
> I got a error:
>
> |test.tex: ! Illegal parameter number in definition of\DEFINETEST|
>
> From StackExchange, I got a answer:
>
> Since ConTeXt is based on TeX, the maximum number of 9 parameters is 
> inherited
>
> So, in Context mkiv, what should I do for more than 9 parameters?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best Regards
>
> Dillon
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________


-- 
Best regards,
ℤh𝕚chu ℂh𝕖n