Re: r2l alignment and linenumbering conflict?

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

On 8/3/2015 9:25 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Hans, Idris, Talal,
>
> Some years ago we had a discussion on the issue, but I don’t remember where we ended up…
> In my opinion, I think that the numberings should be maned as follows:
>
> arabicnumerals: should be  ١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,٠
>
> persiannumerals: should be ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ ۵ ۶ ۷ ۸ ۹ ۰
>
> abjadnumerals: should be الف، ب، ج، د، ه، و، ز،…..
>
> As of today it seems that « persiannumerals » results in what should be named abjadnuemrals, and this is not correct.

so you and idris and tatal has to come to some agreement on that

we have these alphabetic ones

arabicnumerals
persiannumerals
arabicexnumerals

and some special ones

abjadnumerals
abjadnodotnumerals

(these use small, medium, large chars and do special things with 10 100 
1000)

and now

arabicdecimals
persiandecimals

see core-con.lua

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________