> Rik Kabel <mailto:context@rik.users.panix.com>
> 11. August 2015 21:41
> On 2015-08-11 14:49, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Thank you, Wolfgang, for that. But it still does not handle the after 
> key, as I had in my example, and which works in a processor for index 
> entries. Is there no way to do this?
The processor mechanism has no after key and I have no idea what it is 
shoudl do.

Wolfgang