Re: (again) bug with bidi direction and \about references

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

On 8/12/2015 10:19 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
> On 2014-03-04 11:07, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> sorry for telling again, but I’m afraid that the following sample shows
>>> a serious buggy interaction between \setupdirections[bidi=on] and \about
>>> references.
>>>
>>> \setupdirections[bidi=on]
>> No problem with \setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two] (which I still
>> think should be the default, but Hans is not convinced).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Khaled
>
> Khaled,
>
> I too had to rely on method=two as well to get around the problem with
> references appearing at the bottom left of some pages, but this seems to
> be resolved with the recent betas and the changes Hans has made at
> Talal's urging.
>
> Perhaps you could test to see if resolves your cases.

there are three methods:

- default : based on how idris uses structured tex + mixed latin/arabic
- one : from khaled, optimized and extended a bit by me
- two : a follow up on 'one' by me (updated unicode bidi specs + more 
clever fences)

'default' is more efficient and ok for most mixed cases like the ones 
idris needs; i will probably leave 'one' as-is but will at some point 
optimize method 'two' and probably add some options there; also, in the 
case of for instance writing manuals 'default' might be a better choice

anyway, the problem with all methods (and more if it's a strict one) is 
that (as with more solutions) it's hard to get around when you want 
something different; also unicode bidi evolves (and actually the last 
version handles some cases that were the reason for 'default' in the 
first place as idris noted conceptual issues with unicode bidi at that 
time) so one can wonder about compatibility issues with any such 
mechanism that applies some heuristics to input instead of tagging

now, messing with the text stream is one aspect of bidi but that will 
not solve layout issues and special cases like hyperlinks, margin notes, 
images and such because simply reversing the par dir (or text dir) can 
interfere a lot (the dir mechanism in luatex is taken from omega and was 
never made for real complex mixed cases) .. many mechanisms need to be 
made r2l aware

so ... in order to get everything all right we need to test and improve 
stepwise ... no other way

(i'm playing with a better handling of line number for instance, where 
we have quite some interaction between paragraph properties and putting 
numbers at the right spot, and that's only one thing of many ... and i 
prefer to leave the luatex engine untouched ... i'm not really a user of 
r2l myself so ... a slow free-time process)

Hans



-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________