[NTG-context] Re: Local alternative to \input

[Henning Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net>]

Am 04.01.24 um 17:12 schrieb Jeroen:
> I have a document that is getting a lot of mark-up instructions for 
> creating tables and placing figures. I would like to move this out of 
> the main text flow. The easiest way would be using \input, but i rather 
> place all this at the bottom of the file and just refer to it with 
> something like \localinput or so to a textblock at the bottom of the 
> same file. What would be the easiest way to implement this?

Usually, the best way to load setups is using \environment at the top of 
your file.

I don’t understand the sense in placing this in the bottom, and since 
it’s against the flow of instructions it would at least involve a second 
pass, and I don’t see how anything would work without loading it on top.

You could load an environment with a command line option, if you must 
avoid it in your file.

Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________