* why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
@ 2012-04-02 14:46 Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 14:56 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-04-02 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi all,
what's wrong with this code?
\definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no]
\starttext
\incrementnumber[testnumber]
A \getnumber[testnumber]
\stoptext
Works with older betas, craps out with latest.
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 14:46 why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence? Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2012-04-02 14:56 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 15:03 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:15 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2012-04-02 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: Thomas A. Schmitz
On 2-4-2012 16:46, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what's wrong with this code?
>
> \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no]
>
> \starttext
>
> \incrementnumber[testnumber]
>
> A \getnumber[testnumber]
>
> \stoptext
>
> Works with older betas, craps out with latest.
they were already for a while synonyms ... recently all
'structurecounter' names became 'counter' (the structure was a
transition addition in order to have old and new code alongside)
in the process we got rid of the 'number' synonyms
so, just replace number by counter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 14:56 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2012-04-02 15:03 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:15 ` Wolfgang Schuster
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-04-02 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Hagen; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On 04/02/2012 04:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> they were already for a while synonyms ... recently all
> 'structurecounter' names became 'counter' (the structure was a
> transition addition in order to have old and new code alongside)
>
> in the process we got rid of the 'number' synonyms
>
> so, just replace number by counter
you mean, as in
\definecounter [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no]
\starttext
\incrementcounter[testnumber]
A \getcounter[testnumber]
\stoptext
That gives
! Undefined control sequence.
...
l.9 A \getcounter
[testnumber]
Did you maybe miss a file when you uploaded?
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 14:56 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 15:03 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2012-04-02 15:15 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-04-02 15:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-04-02 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; +Cc: Hans Hagen, Thomas A. Schmitz
Am 02.04.2012 um 16:56 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 2-4-2012 16:46, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> what's wrong with this code?
>>
>> \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no]
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> \incrementnumber[testnumber]
>>
>> A \getnumber[testnumber]
>>
>> \stoptext
>>
>> Works with older betas, craps out with latest.
>
> they were already for a while synonyms ... recently all 'structurecounter' names became 'counter' (the structure was a transition addition in order to have old and new code alongside)
>
> in the process we got rid of the 'number' synonyms
>
> so, just replace number by counter
The problem are these two synonyms:
\let \getnumber \getcounter % [name]
\let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name]
There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter.
@Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the numeric value of the counter or \convertedcounter for a formatted form of the counter (you can apply a conversion, e.g. romannumerals or add a prefix, e.g. the current chapter or section number).
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 15:15 ` Wolfgang Schuster
@ 2012-04-02 15:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:33 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 16:37 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2012-04-02 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Schuster; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users, Hans Hagen
On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> The problem are these two synonyms:
>
> \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name]
> \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name]
>
> There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter.
>
> @Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the numeric value of the counter or \convertedcounter for a formatted form of the counter (you can apply a conversion, e.g. romannumerals or add a prefix, e.g. the current chapter or section number).
>
> Wolfgang
Ah, thank you Wolfgang! \rawcounter is sufficient for me in my real-life
case, but I assume you will want to add \getcounter? (And are the number
synonyms here to stay, or will they be deleted?)
All best
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 15:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2012-04-02 15:33 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 16:37 ` Wolfgang Schuster
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2012-04-02 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas A. Schmitz; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On 2-4-2012 17:20, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> The problem are these two synonyms:
>>
>> \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name]
>> \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name]
>>
>> There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter.
>>
>> @Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the numeric value of the
>> counter or \convertedcounter for a formatted form of the counter (you
>> can apply a conversion, e.g. romannumerals or add a prefix, e.g. the
>> current chapter or section number).
>>
>> Wolfgang
>
> Ah, thank you Wolfgang! \rawcounter is sufficient for me in my real-life
> case, but I assume you will want to add \getcounter? (And are the number
> synonyms here to stay, or will they be deleted?)
they might stay as they are in manuals but best start using the counter
names (reason: a,b,c is counting but not numbering)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
2012-04-02 15:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:33 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2012-04-02 16:37 ` Wolfgang Schuster
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2012-04-02 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas A. Schmitz; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users, Hans Hagen
Am 02.04.2012 um 17:20 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
> On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> The problem are these two synonyms:
>>
>> \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name]
>> \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name]
>>
>> There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter.
>>
>> @Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the numeric value of the counter or \convertedcounter for a formatted form of the counter (you can apply a conversion, e.g. romannumerals or add a prefix, e.g. the current chapter or section number).
>>
>> Wolfgang
>
> Ah, thank you Wolfgang! \rawcounter is sufficient for me in my real-life case, but I assume you will want to add \getcounter? (And are the number synonyms here to stay, or will they be deleted?)
There is no need for a \getcounter command, you can fix it by making both synonyms for the \convertedcounter command.
\let\getnumber \convertedcounter
\let\convertednumber\convertedcounter
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-02 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-02 14:46 why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence? Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 14:56 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 15:03 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:15 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2012-04-02 15:20 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2012-04-02 15:33 ` Hans Hagen
2012-04-02 16:37 ` Wolfgang Schuster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).