From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/92972 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: meaning of error message? Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:07 +0100 Message-ID: <5659D6CB.5030806@gmail.com> References: <5654C817.3040204@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5125799757168710937==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448728304 18118 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2015 16:31:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:31:44 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Nov 28 17:31:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iPJ-0007eq-Hl for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A584F4E1C; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WHc6yHt64Tq; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B24E1F; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDBE4E1A for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk-TbhhG2MXd for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788504E18 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:31:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so84078561wmw.1 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 08:31:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=MBhPhmV9Udjj4LgaNJOuf8ODBIoOtV3U1tDffHtsxEY=; b=WrWjbVQh5qG9QTOzYsPKwpbRbH+ZErULqgaqr4SnF+VazIkuY3DKTpmOJFftnwHi5O lkx1kAwbOu8KI3ik2m+cSG0BXjMdkeGJ2KCF1l21PwKFoXrITc2oX8OVClLe/XFEnnRW sFFrM/RsMhkwq5hET/37fTBxBwgLHcvzQ76ulDMBKYuHF8b6T9haHS3s87CGoibGBg6R t+deohgdfRXJKca1OSnrWsX24DK/DM0rQGr+XmeaUzu/dEtBRPmkivZxEimrNrcMMHZz X/4tHQqDaB63wtX/GCrsJ/gWZWjLRjooe+URA3f3bEcoyKs1o+GKnJmCO3JK+vs1s+HZ VsBw== X-Received: by 10.28.184.13 with SMTP id i13mr16418128wmf.31.1448728268163; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 08:31:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from keima.localdomain (x2f2b777.dyn.telefonica.de. [2.242.183.119]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm38083255wjz.4.2015.11.28.08.31.06 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 28 Nov 2015 08:31:07 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:92972 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============5125799757168710937== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050500030807030507070402" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050500030807030507070402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Alan Bowen > 25. November 2015 um 17:33 > Hi, Wolfgang=E2=80=94 > > The lines from the file are: > > > \startextract <=E2=80=94 LINE 43 > \startparagraph > \startlines > . > . > \footnote[particles]{A look at the particles in this sentence suggests=20 > that something has gone wrong. The initial =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB i= s mildly=20 > adversative, as is the =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB at the beginning of t= he sentence opening=20 > the second paragraph. This is in line with the careful disposition of=20 > the {\emph cola} in the whole introduction: independent, principal=20 > clauses are always introduced by conjunctive =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB= , and inside them=20 > the subclauses in contraposition are regularly marked by the canonical=20 > =C2=AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD \dots =CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB. Moreover, every =C2= =AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD}=C2=BB is answered by a =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB= . The=20 > only exception is the =C2=AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD}=C2=BB in this sentence= [lines 23=E2=80=9324]: a clause=20 > such as =C2=AB{=CE=BF=E1=BC=B1 =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2 =E1=BC=90=CF=80=CE=B9=CE= =BC=CE=B5=CF=81=CE=B5=E1=BF=96=CF=B2 =CE=BF=E1=BD=94}=C2=BB (\quote{where= as epimeric do not}) is=20 > surely missing due to scribal mistake. I regard the correction as=20 > certain, given the strictly analogous structure of the immediately=20 > following sentence. Nothing in the interpretation that I shall develop=20 > depends on this textual detail, however.} > % > =CE=93=CE=B9=CE=BD=CF=8E=CF=B2=CE=BA=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=B5=CE=BD =CE=B4=E1=BD= =B2 =CE=BA=CE=B1=E1=BD=B6 =CF=84=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD =CF=86=CE=B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE= =B3=CF=89=CE=BD =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=BC=E1=BD=B2=CE=BD =CF=B2=CF= =85=CE=BC=CF=86=CF=8E{-} > =CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =E1=BD=84=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CF=B2, =CF=84=CE=BF= =E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2 =CE=B4=CE=B9=CE=B1=CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF= =CF=85=CF=B2, =CE=BA=CE=B1=E1=BD=B6 =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=BC=E1= =BD=B2=CE=BD =CF=B2=CF=85=CE=BC=CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 > =CE=BC=CE=AF=CE=B1=CE=BD =CE=BA=CF=81=E1=BE=B6=CF=B2=CE=B9=CE=BD =CF=84= =E1=BD=B4=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BE =E1=BC=80=CE=BC=CF=86=CE=BF=E1=BF=96=CE=BD= =CF=80=CE=BF=CE=B9=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CF=B2, =CF=84=CE=BF=E1= =BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2 =CE=B4=CE=B9=CE=B1=CF=86=CF=8E{-} <=E2=80=94= LINE 62 > =CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =CE=BF=E1=BD=94. =CF=84=CE=BF=CF=8D=CF=84=CF=89= =CE=BD =CE=BF=E1=BD=95=CF=84=CF=89=CF=B2 =E1=BC=90=CF=87=CF=8C=CE=BD=CF=84= =CF=89=CE=BD =CE=B5=E1=BC=B0=CE=BA=E1=BD=B8=CF=B2\note[03] =CF=84=CE=BF=E1= =BD=BA=CF=B2 =CF=B2=CF=85=CE=BC=CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 > % > \footnotetext[03]{=CE=B5=E1=BC=B0=CE=BA=CF=8C=CF=B2: notice the determi= nation of likelihood in a=20 > place where in the first paragraph one finds two occurrences of a=20 > determination of necessity. I would link this feature to a perceptibly=20 > less firm status of the assumed correspondence between notes and=20 > numbers. Compare the more precise statement occurring on the second=20 > line of the first paragraph: =C2=AB{=CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CF=86=CE= =B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE=B3=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =E1=BC=80=CE=BD=CE=B1=CE=B3=CE=BA= =CE=B1=E1=BF=96=CE=BF=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BD =E1=BC=80=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=B8=CE= =BC=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6 =CE=BB=CF=8C=CE=B3=E1=BF=B3=20 > =CE=BB=CE=AD=CE=B3=CE=B5=CF=B2=CE=B8=CE=B1=CE=B9 =CF=80=CF=81=E1=BD=B8=CF= =B2 =E1=BC=80=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=AE=CE=BB=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2}=C2=BB.} > % > \Lmt{M160.1}=CF=86=CE=B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE=B3=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2, =E1=BC=90= =CF=80=CE=B5=CE=B9=CE=B4=E1=BD=B4 =CE=BC=CE=AF=CE=B1=CE=BD =CF=84=E1=BD=B4= =CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BE =E1=BC=80=CE=BC=CF=86=CE=BF=E1=BF=96=CE=BD =CF=80=CE= =BF=CE=B9=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CE=B9 =CE=BA=CF=81=E1=BE=B6=CF= =B2=CE=B9=CE=BD > =CF=84=E1=BF=86=CF=B2 =CF=86=CF=89=CE=BD=E1=BF=86=CF=B2, =CE=B5=E1=BC=B6= =CE=BD=CE=B1=CE=B9 \underbar{=CF=84=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BD =E1=BC= =91=CE=BD=E1=BD=B6 =E1=BD=80=CE=BD=CF=8C=CE=BC=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=B9 =CF=80=CF= =81=E1=BD=B8=CF=B2 =E1=BC=80=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=AE=CE=BB=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 > =CE=BB=CE=B5=CE=B3=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD=CF=89=CE=BD =E1=BC=80=CF=81=CE= =B9=CE=B8=CE=BC=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD},\note[04] =E1=BC=A4=CF=84=CE=BF=CE=B9 =CF= =80=CE=BF=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=B1=CF=80=CE=BB=CE=B1=CF=B2=CE=AF=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2= =E1=BD=84=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CF=B2 =E1=BC=A2 =E1=BC=90=CF=80=CE=B9{-} > % > \footnotetext[04]{The {\emph variatio} =C2=AB({=E1=BC=90=CE=BD}) {=E1=BC= =91=CE=BD=E1=BD=B6 =E1=BD=80=CE=BD=CF=8C=CE=BC=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=B9}=C2=BB i= s very=20 > likely a scribal {\emph lapsus}, even if it is not clear whether the=20 > mistake is a haplography or a dittography.} > % > =CE=BC=CE=BF=CF=81=CE=AF=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2. > \stoplines > \stopparagraph > \stopextract <=E2=80=94 LINE 80 > > > =E2=80=8BMany thanks for any thoughts on this or advice. > Did you create a command with \definehighlight which is used in this=20 part of the document? Wolfgang --------------050500030807030507070402 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alan Bowen
25= .=20 November 2015 um 17:33
H= i,=20 Wolfgang=E2=80=94

The lines from the file are:
=
=
= \startextract =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <=E2=80=94 LINE 43\= startparagraph
= \startlines
= .
= .
=
\footnote[particles]{A look at the particles in=20 this sentence suggests that something has gone wrong. The initial =C2=AB{= =CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB is mildly adversative, as is the =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB at the begin= ning of the=20 sentence opening the second paragraph. This is in line with the careful=20 disposition of the {\emph cola} in the whole introduction: independent,=20 principal clauses are always introduced by conjunctive =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD= }=C2=BB, and=20 inside them the subclauses in contraposition are regularly marked by the canonical =C2=AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD \dots =CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB. Moreover,= every =C2=AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD}=C2=BB is answered by a=20 =C2=AB{=CE=B4=CE=AD}=C2=BB. The only exception is the =C2=AB{=CE=BC=CE=AD= =CE=BD}=C2=BB in this sentence [lines=20 23=E2=80=9324]: a clause such as =C2=AB{=CE=BF=E1=BC=B1 =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2 =E1= =BC=90=CF=80=CE=B9=CE=BC=CE=B5=CF=81=CE=B5=E1=BF=96=CF=B2 =CE=BF=E1=BD=94= }=C2=BB (\quote{whereas epimeric do not}) is surely missing due to scribal mistake. I regard the=20 correction as certain, given the strictly analogous structure of the=20 immediately following sentence. Nothing in the interpretation that I=20 shall develop depends on this textual detail, however.}
%
=CE=93=CE=B9=CE= =BD=CF=8E=CF=B2=CE=BA=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=B5=CE=BD =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2=20 =CE=BA=CE=B1=E1=BD=B6 =CF=84=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD =CF=86=CE=B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE=B3= =CF=89=CE=BD =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=BC=E1=BD=B2=CE=BD =CF=B2=CF=85= =CE=BC=CF=86=CF=8E{-}
=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85= =CF=B2=20 =E1=BD=84=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CF=B2, =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=B4=E1=BD= =B2 =CE=B4=CE=B9=CE=B1=CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2, =CE=BA=CE=B1=E1= =BD=B6 =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=BC=E1=BD=B2=CE=BD =CF=B2=CF=85=CE=BC= =CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2=C2=A0
=CE=BC=CE=AF=CE=B1=CE=BD =CE=BA=CF=81=E1=BE=B6=CF= =B2=CE=B9=CE=BD =CF=84=E1=BD=B4=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BE =E1=BC=80=CE=BC=CF=86= =CE=BF=E1=BF=96=CE=BD =CF=80=CE=BF=CE=B9=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1= =CF=B2, =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2 =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2=20 =CE=B4=CE=B9=CE=B1=CF=86=CF=8E{-} =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=20 <=E2=80=94 =C2=A0=C2=A0 LINE 62
=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =CE=BF=E1=BD=94. =CF=84=CE=BF=CF=8D=CF=84=CF=89= =CE=BD=20 =CE=BF=E1=BD=95=CF=84=CF=89=CF=B2 =E1=BC=90=CF=87=CF=8C=CE=BD=CF=84=CF=89= =CE=BD =CE=B5=E1=BC=B0=CE=BA=E1=BD=B8=CF=B2\note[03] =CF=84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA= =CF=B2 =CF=B2=CF=85=CE=BC=CF=86=CF=8E=CE=BD=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2
%
\footnotetext= [03]{=CE=B5=E1=BC=B0=CE=BA=CF=8C=CF=B2: notice the determination of likelihood in a place where in the first=20 paragraph one finds two occurrences of a determination of necessity. I=20 would link this feature to a perceptibly less firm status of the assumed correspondence between notes and numbers. Compare the more precise=20 statement occurring on the second line of the first paragraph: =C2=AB{=CF= =84=CE=BF=E1=BD=BA=CF=B2=20 =CF=86=CE=B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE=B3=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =E1=BC=80=CE=BD=CE=B1=CE= =B3=CE=BA=CE=B1=E1=BF=96=CE=BF=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BD =E1=BC=80=CF=81=CE=B9= =CE=B8=CE=BC=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6 =CE=BB=CF=8C=CE=B3=E1=BF=B3 =CE=BB=CE=AD=CE=B3= =CE=B5=CF=B2=CE=B8=CE=B1=CE=B9 =CF=80=CF=81=E1=BD=B8=CF=B2 =E1=BC=80=CE=BB= =CE=BB=CE=AE=CE=BB=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2}=C2=BB.}
%
\Lmt{= M160.1}=CF=86=CE=B8=CF=8C=CE=B3=CE=B3=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2, =E1=BC=90=CF=80=CE=B5=CE=B9=CE=B4=E1=BD=B4 =CE=BC=CE=AF=CE=B1=CE=BD =CF=84= =E1=BD=B4=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BE =E1=BC=80=CE=BC=CF=86=CE=BF=E1=BF=96=CE=BD= =CF=80=CE=BF=CE=B9=CE=BF=E1=BF=A6=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CE=B9 =CE=BA=CF=81=E1= =BE=B6=CF=B2=CE=B9=CE=BD=C2=A0
=CF=84=E1=BF=86=CF=B2 =CF=86=CF=89= =CE=BD=E1=BF=86=CF=B2, =CE=B5=E1=BC=B6=CE=BD=CE=B1=CE=B9=20 \underbar{=CF=84=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD =E1=BC=90=CE=BD =E1=BC=91=CE=BD=E1=BD=B6 = =E1=BD=80=CE=BD=CF=8C=CE=BC=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=B9 =CF=80=CF=81=E1=BD=B8=CF=B2= =E1=BC=80=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=AE=CE=BB=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2=C2=A0
=CE=BB= =CE=B5=CE=B3=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=AD=CE=BD=CF=89=CE=BD=20 =E1=BC=80=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=B8=CE=BC=E1=BF=B6=CE=BD},\note[04] =C2=A0=E1=BC=A4= =CF=84=CE=BF=CE=B9 =CF=80=CE=BF=CE=BB=CE=BB=CE=B1=CF=80=CE=BB=CE=B1=CF=B2= =CE=AF=CE=BF=CF=85=CF=B2 =E1=BD=84=CE=BD=CF=84=CE=B1=CF=B2 =E1=BC=A2 =E1=BC= =90=CF=80=CE=B9{-}
%
\footnotetext[04]{The {\emph variatio} =C2=AB({=E1=BC=90=CE=BD}) {=E1=BC=91=CE=BD=E1=BD=B6 =E1= =BD=80=CE=BD=CF=8C=CE=BC=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=B9}=C2=BB is very likely a scriba= l {\emph lapsus}, even if it is not clear whether the mistake is a haplography=20 or a dittography.}
%
=CE=BC=CE=BF=CF=81=CE=AF=CE=BF=CF= =85=CF=B2.
\stoplines
\stopparagraph
\s= topextract =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<=E2=80=94 LINE 80


=E2=80=8BMany thanks for any thoughts on this or = advice.

Did you create a command with \definehighlight which is used in this=20 part of the document?

Wolfgang
--------------050500030807030507070402-- --===============5125799757168710937== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly90ZXguYWFuaGV0Lm5ldAphcmNoaXZlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3VuZHJ5LnN1cGVsZWMu ZnIvcHJvamVjdHMvY29udGV4dHJldi8Kd2lraSAgICAgOiBodHRwOi8vY29udGV4dGdhcmRlbi5u ZXQKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18= --===============5125799757168710937==--