From: Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: has the bidi mechanism been changed?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:02:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <566F2E83.7090805@gmx.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <566AE2CC.40605@wxs.nl>
On 12/11/2015 03:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, talazem@fastmail.fm wrote:
>> Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
>> redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
>> beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
>>
>> In the present beta, it reads:
>>
>> While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
>> direction of the parentheses):
>
> there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86
Hans,
I wonder whether this is a related issue to this bug:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\setupreferencing[left=, right=, interaction=all]
\setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two]
\starttext
\section[sectionone]{Section one}
No text after the first line:\\\about[sectionone]
Misplaced text
\stoptext
Text after \about is misplaced at bottom left only if the reference text
starts a line.
It works fine with stable from 2015.05.18 12:26 (and beta from
2015.09.13 13:31). It works wrong with latest beta from 2015.11.19 19:13.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-14 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-11 9:21 talazem
2015-12-11 14:50 ` Hans Hagen
2015-12-14 21:02 ` Pablo Rodriguez [this message]
2015-12-14 22:06 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=566F2E83.7090805@gmx.es \
--to=oinos@gmx.es \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).