ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* has the bidi mechanism been changed?
@ 2015-12-11  9:21 talazem
  2015-12-11 14:50 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: talazem @ 2015-12-11  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 364 bytes --]

Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the beta operative in September 2015, these were working. 

In the present beta, it reads:


While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the direction of the parentheses):


Kind regards,
Talal

[-- Attachment #1.2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 1213 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.2.2: PastedGraphic-5.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 18355 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.2.3: PastedGraphic-6.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 17960 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: has the bidi mechanism been changed?
  2015-12-11  9:21 has the bidi mechanism been changed? talazem
@ 2015-12-11 14:50 ` Hans Hagen
  2015-12-14 21:02   ` Pablo Rodriguez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2015-12-11 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, talazem@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
> redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
> beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
>
> In the present beta, it reads:
>
> While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
> direction of the parentheses):

there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: has the bidi mechanism been changed?
  2015-12-11 14:50 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2015-12-14 21:02   ` Pablo Rodriguez
  2015-12-14 22:06     ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez @ 2015-12-14 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On 12/11/2015 03:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, talazem@fastmail.fm wrote:
>> Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
>> redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
>> beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
>>
>> In the present beta, it reads:
>>
>> While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
>> direction of the parentheses):
> 
> there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86

Hans,

I wonder whether this is a related issue to this bug:

    \setupinteraction[state=start]
    \setupreferencing[left=, right=, interaction=all]
    \setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two]
    \starttext
    \section[sectionone]{Section one}
    No text after the first line:\\\about[sectionone]
    Misplaced text
    \stoptext

Text after \about is misplaced at bottom left only if the reference text
starts a line.

It works fine with stable from 2015.05.18 12:26 (and beta from
2015.09.13 13:31). It works wrong with latest beta from 2015.11.19 19:13.

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: has the bidi mechanism been changed?
  2015-12-14 21:02   ` Pablo Rodriguez
@ 2015-12-14 22:06     ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2015-12-14 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

On 12/14/2015 10:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 03:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 12/11/2015 10:21 AM, talazem@fastmail.fm wrote:
>>> Has the bidi mechanism (method=one, or method=two, etc.) been changed or
>>> redefined? My RTL brackets and numbers are being inverted. As of the
>>> beta operative in September 2015, these were working.
>>>
>>> In the present beta, it reads:
>>>
>>> While it should read (notice the ordering of the numbers as well as the
>>> direction of the parentheses):
>>
>> there is a rtl bug in 0.85 which is fixed in upcoming 0.86
>
> Hans,
>
> I wonder whether this is a related issue to this bug:
>
>      \setupinteraction[state=start]
>      \setupreferencing[left=, right=, interaction=all]
>      \setupdirections[bidi=on,method=two]
>      \starttext
>      \section[sectionone]{Section one}
>      No text after the first line:\\\about[sectionone]
>      Misplaced text
>      \stoptext
>
> Text after \about is misplaced at bottom left only if the reference text
> starts a line.
>
> It works fine with stable from 2015.05.18 12:26 (and beta from
> 2015.09.13 13:31). It works wrong with latest beta from 2015.11.19 19:13.

yes and that is fixed in the next version

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-14 22:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-11  9:21 has the bidi mechanism been changed? talazem
2015-12-11 14:50 ` Hans Hagen
2015-12-14 21:02   ` Pablo Rodriguez
2015-12-14 22:06     ` Hans Hagen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).