Re: two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)

[Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>]

On 02/23/2016 09:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> the hyperlink mechanism currently has the options page,name,auto (auto 
> being default) so you can try name but still not get what you want; the 
> page variant is needed for documents with 100K or more hyperlinks (and 
> in fact the ability to choose between name/page is also there because in 
> principle we can have backends that only support page linking ... i 
> forgot the details but when pdf came out and acrobat / dvipsone was 
> supported one had named only and the other page only destinations; if i 
> kick out that kind of flexibility we're locked into pdf completely)

Hans,

sorry, but I could only test it yesterday.

I’m afraid it doesn’t work. I suspect what the issue here is.

\setupinteraction[page=name] (or \setupinteraction[focus=standard]) only
affects to the links generated by lpdf-ano.lua.

But footnotes (endnotes, linenotes, index references and similar ones)
have destination links generated by lpdf-epa.lua.

I may be misreading your comment from line 85 in lpdf-epa.lua. But this
is what I get after grepping for "/Fit" in
tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/ from the beta.

Wouldn’t it be better to have a single code to generate (destination)
links? At least, this would prevent problems such as this one (if I’m
not missing something).

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________